If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
If you are having difficulty logging in, please REFRESH the page and clear your browser cache and try again.
If you still can't get logged in, please try using Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome, Firefox, Opera, or Safari to login. Also be sure you are using the latest version of your browser. Internet Explorer has not been updated in over seven years and will no longer work with the Forum software. Thanks
inflation hits 6.2%—wiping out the raises of those lucky enough to even have a good job—parents are worried about the price of milk for their kids (when the shelves aren't empty) and the establishment is like:
My wish is that this kind of bull-shit above is exposed as the huge danger to the nation that it is. We're a receptive audience to what we're seeing carrying our own biases into judgement. The risk is that not enough of "us" is going to get the important message the Rittenhouse trial is capable of conveying.
The judge in this case has an immense opportunity to speak on the kinds of "injustice" we see in our group here. The injustice I speak of isn't about racism or inequities - that's another story altogether. Its about the injustices being heaped on American citizens of all races, like Rittenhouse, that value the tenets of the US Constitution, jurisprudence that follows the law, civic responsibility and the maintenance of civil order by local governments.
Of course, that's not going to happen in this criminal court but Rittenhouse will undoubtedly take his case for compensation resulting from the injustice heaped on him before a civil court. It's here that it is likely to reach a federal district court on appeal. At that level, judges are expected to look at the bigger picture. The opportunity in a conservative court for such an opportunity is like manna from haven for a federal judge seeking notoriety and a willingness to call out the progressive and radical left for what unreasonable overreactions that have occurred since the George Floyd killing at the hands of police.
Mission to CFB's National Championship accomplished. But the shine on the NC Trophy is embarrassingly wearing off. It's M B-Ball ..... or hockey or volley ball or name your college sport favorite time ...... until next year.
I love the argument that he had a sling on his gun so that it wouldn't be taken away from him, yet he shot when someone was trying to take it away from him.
what? since he has a sling, he should just let a visibly aggressive person grab/control his rifle and lose his only defense against an angry mob?
My wish is that this kind of bull-shit above is exposed as the huge danger to the nation that it is. We're a receptive audience to what we're seeing carrying our own biases into judgement. The risk is that not enough of "us" is going to get the important message the Rittenhouse trial is capable of conveying.
The judge in this case has an immense opportunity to speak on the kinds of "injustice" we see in our group here. The injustice I speak of isn't about racism or inequities - that's another story altogether. Its about the injustices being heaped on American citizens of all races, like Rittenhouse, that value the tenets of the US Constitution, jurisprudence that follows the law, civic responsibility and the maintenance of civil order by local governments.
Of course, that's not going to happen in this criminal court but Rittenhouse will undoubtedly take his case for compensation resulting from the injustice heaped on him before a civil court. It's here that it is likely to reach a federal district court on appeal. At that level, judges are expected to look at the bigger picture. The opportunity in a conservative court for such an opportunity is like manna from haven for a federal judge seeking notoriety and a willingness to call out the progressive and radical left for what unreasonable overreactions that have occurred since the George Floyd killing at the hands of police.
"The Left would happily tear the constitution to shreds, cheer on prosecutorial misconduct and perjury, cut the law to pieces, embrace corruption and tyranny, and send an innocent man to prison to satisfy its lust for racial vengeance. That is what we are up against."
Eh, they can do it in closing. The important thing isn’t whether they scored points against him, it’s whether they damaged his credibility. You always lose points on cross. The goal is to have enough points built up on direct that you’re still comfortably ahead at the end.
Dan Patrick: What was your reaction to [Urban Meyer being hired]? Brady Hoke: You know.....not....good.
If he was from Nebraska...it would be a close deal until the end...then the defense would fuck it up at the end...lose by single digits...stay the course...
Tweet
Comment