It's not just the courts that seem to me to be providing slam-dunk rulings on claims of voter fraud. That should constitute all the "substantive argument" you claim you need before you'll abandon your hypothesis.
Yet there's more anecdotal evidence that this sort of twisted made up reality - news stories floated that this or that happened at this or that voting place or machine or drop box - is a brazen effort to distort reality to support such claims of fraud. As well, you've got all these notables, Giuliani one of them, lying their asses off to create this false narrative. I can't understand how intelligent people are clinging to it.
Yet there's more anecdotal evidence that this sort of twisted made up reality - news stories floated that this or that happened at this or that voting place or machine or drop box - is a brazen effort to distort reality to support such claims of fraud. As well, you've got all these notables, Giuliani one of them, lying their asses off to create this false narrative. I can't understand how intelligent people are clinging to it.
Comment