Originally posted by Da Geezer
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
Please support the Forum by using the Amazon Link this Holiday Season
Amazon has started their Black Friday sales and there are some great deals to be had! As you shop this holiday season, please consider using the forum's Amazon.com link (listed in the menu as "Amazon Link") to add items to your cart and purchase them. The forum gets a small commission from every item sold.
Additionally, the forum gets a "bounty" for various offers at Amazon.com. For instance, if you sign up for a 30 day free trial of Amazon Prime, the forum will earn $3. Same if you buy a Prime membership for someone else as a gift! Trying out or purchasing an Audible membership will earn the forum a few bucks. And creating an Amazon Business account will send a $15 commission our way.
If you have an Amazon Echo, you need a free trial of Amazon Music!! We will earn $3 and it's free to you!
Your personal information is completely private, I only get a list of items that were ordered/shipped via the link, no names or locations or anything. This does not cost you anything extra and it helps offset the operating costs of this forum, which include our hosting fees and the yearly registration and licensing fees.
Stay safe and well and thank you for your participation in the Forum and for your support!! --Deborah
Here is the link:
Click here to shop at Amazon.com
Additionally, the forum gets a "bounty" for various offers at Amazon.com. For instance, if you sign up for a 30 day free trial of Amazon Prime, the forum will earn $3. Same if you buy a Prime membership for someone else as a gift! Trying out or purchasing an Audible membership will earn the forum a few bucks. And creating an Amazon Business account will send a $15 commission our way.
If you have an Amazon Echo, you need a free trial of Amazon Music!! We will earn $3 and it's free to you!
Your personal information is completely private, I only get a list of items that were ordered/shipped via the link, no names or locations or anything. This does not cost you anything extra and it helps offset the operating costs of this forum, which include our hosting fees and the yearly registration and licensing fees.
Stay safe and well and thank you for your participation in the Forum and for your support!! --Deborah
Here is the link:
Click here to shop at Amazon.com
See more
See less
Miscellaneous And Off Topic Subjects
Collapse
X
-
Sorry man, dems gave up the "my body my choice" position when they started pushing vax mandates.
You can't take that position for abortion rights, but then toss it out when it comes to vaccines. Its both or none."The stockings were hung by the chimney with care, .. I'd worn them for weeks, and they needed the air"
- Top
Comment
-
To be exceptionally fucking clear -- the Supreme Court denial was strictly procedural. If this case were anything other than an abortion case, it would have been 9-0. The plaintiffs are seeking to prevent people from doing something that they are either (a) incapable of doing that thing; or (b) have stated they have zero intention of doing that thing. It is, in short, akin to a case against me seeking to enjoin me from riding a flying cadillac to Jupiter. It's beyond ridiculous.
Roberts even ackowledges as much -- which, I'm sure DSL read and understood -- he says that defendants “may be correct” that “existing doctrines preclude judicial intervention.” LOL -- "may".
The other 3 aren't at all concerned about standing in the fucking least when it comes to abortion. They are entirely OUTCOME driven.
Kudos to the 5 justices for actually following the obvious law despite the pressure to do otherwise. And, lest there be any doubt that this is entirely procedural (and correct):
In reaching this conclusion, we stress that we do not purport to resolve definitively any jurisdictional or substantive claim in the applicants’ lawsuit. In particular, this order is not based on any conclusion about the constitutionality of Texas’s law, and in no way limits other procedurally proper challenges to the Texas law, including in Texas state courts.Dan Patrick: What was your reaction to [Urban Meyer being hired]?
Brady Hoke: You know.....not....good.
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by iam416 View PostTo be exceptionally fucking clear -- the Supreme Court denial was strictly procedural. If this case were anything other than an abortion case, it would have been 9-0. The plaintiffs are seeking to prevent people from doing something that they are either (a) incapable of doing that thing; or (b) have stated they have zero intention of doing that thing. It is, in short, akin to a case against me seeking to enjoin me from riding a flying cadillac to Jupiter. It's beyond ridiculous.
Roberts even ackowledges as much -- which, I'm sure DSL read and understood -- he says that defendants “may be correct” that “existing doctrines preclude judicial intervention.” LOL -- "may".
The other 3 aren't at all concerned about standing in the fucking least when it comes to abortion. They are entirely OUTCOME driven.
Kudos to the 5 justices for actually following the obvious law despite the pressure to do otherwise. And, lest there be any doubt that this is entirely procedural (and correct):
But, it's abortion, so...rule of law goes out the window for The Left.
- Top
Comment
-
Hey, no matter what side of the aisle you are on - Left or Right - there is one common thread that all of you gentlemen share. You are all, and I mean ALL, mind-numbingly insufferable blow hards."The problem with quotes on the Internet is that it is sometimes hard to verify their authenticity." -Abraham Lincoln
- Top
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by AlabamAlum View PostHey, no matter what side of the aisle you are on - Left or Right - there is one common thread that all of you gentlemen share. You are all, and I mean ALL, mind-numbingly insufferable blow hards.
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dr. Strangelove View Post
Let's say California wants to pass an egregiously unconstitutional law. So long as they delegate out the enforcement of that law to private non-state actors, would it be impossible for the highest court in the land to enjoin the law? My reading of Roberts is that he doesn't think states can or should be able to evade responsibility this way.Last edited by Kapture1; September 2, 2021, 11:17 AM.
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by AlabamAlum View PostHey, no matter what side of the aisle you are on - Left or Right - there is one common thread that all of you gentlemen share. You are all, and I mean ALL, mind-numbingly insufferable blow hards."The stockings were hung by the chimney with care, .. I'd worn them for weeks, and they needed the air"
- Top
Comment
-
Pretty engaging article about the last 5 planes out of Kabul from the perspective of some of the pilots and crew.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...ts/5693911001/
- Top
Comment
Comment