If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
If you are having difficulty logging in, please REFRESH the page and clear your browser cache and try again.
If you still can't get logged in, please try using Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome, Firefox, Opera, or Safari to login. Also be sure you are using the latest version of your browser. Internet Explorer has not been updated in over seven years and will no longer work with the Forum software. Thanks
My takeway is that the citizens of DFW have soundly chosen to invest in their city and I'm well-pleased for them and particularly well-pleased it angers Hoss so. Otherwise, windmills continue to be in serious jeopardy around here.
Doesn't anger me...I await the inevitable bankruptcy of the state of Texas with glee.
Recent events point toward falling levels of oxygen in Ohio however...a state in dire need of increased brain function. Unfortunate.
Ah, there's the culprit. Well, there is whole universe of thought and science outside the realm of "Super Size Me" Hanni.
I have been following this shit for a long time. Fads and boogeymen come and go. Every one is because "Muh science". It's all the same. Smug food nannies like Jamie Oliver, Michelle Obama, and Morgan Spurlock insist that they have the answer and they are going to teach the unwashed masses of the world how to eat properly, because we haven't actually spent the last 30 years extolling the virtues of grilled chicken and brocooli enough. It's always the same. Really, it is.
Meanwhile...
Don't worry guys -- we finally got the solution this time.
I have been following this shit for a long time. Fads and boogeymen come and go. Every one is because "Muh science". It's all the same. Smug food nannies like Jamie Oliver, Michelle Obama, and Morgan Spurlock insist that they have the answer and they are going to teach the unwashed masses of the world how to eat properly. It's always the same. Really, it is.
Meanwhile...
Don't worry guys -- we finally got the solution this time.
Seriously...you're going to argue that trying to improve label accuracy and food content is bad?
BTW, I agree with your point on fads. Sugar, fat, pesticides, transfat...on and on. Different aspects have had their time under the microscope.
That doesn’t make it a bad thing though. Speaks more to how messed up our food is, and the inability of society to focus on more than one problem at a time in a given realm. JMO
Not sure. Issues about the quality of our food supply is not the same as the issues surrounding Global Warming and I'll agree here, that's somewhat of a Windmill.
The problem with Hanni's argument about taking responsibility for one's food choices is valid to a point. Once a population reaches the stage where (1) there is plenty of food and (2) there is enough money to purchase it, then its about choices.
On the macro level, those of us debating these issues here are in the 1%. We have choices to make. The 99% (1) doesn't have enough food and (2) when food is available, there's no money to buy it.
On the micro level and in our own cities, for those at the bottom of the socioeconomic scale, some might shamefully be included in that 99%, what is easily available to eat is not grilled chicken and broccoli, its not a piece of fruit; for kids on their way to school, it's usually a bag of chips and a Coke from the convenience store down the street assuming they have the money to buy it and assuming they had anything to eat at all...... and, sorry, that's entirely different discussion.
I get your position on most things, Hanni. I agree with you most of the time. But in the big scheme of things, requiring labeling about what goes into the foods we eat is about holding those 10 corporations that control the world's food supply accountable. In the case of the FDA and in this narrow discussion about added sugar in food, it's about what's being made available to eat by those who live in the US. It's about encouraging corporate responsibility. Not a bad thing when done correctly.
Mission to CFB's National Championship accomplished. JH chased Saban from Alabama and caused Day, at the point of the OSU AD's gun, to make major changes to his staff just to beat Michigan. Love it. It's Moore!!!! time
Warnings are irrelevant, IMO. Hanni would then argue that if there's any cost then that cost outweighs zero benefit. Eh, whatever.
I have a hard time brooking arguments about low cost food supplies. I can't stand noxious, elitist "farm-to-table" or anti-GMO policy positions that would significantly increase the cost of food in this country and decrease availability. And what's more, these are mostly "progressives" making these arguments that would very directly and very surely negatively impact poor folks.
I guess, on one level, it's cool -- our country is so fucking awesome we're worried about people eating too much and the wrong kinds of foods. It's a tremendous luxury to be able to have this debate. On the other hand, the discussion ought to focus on existing calorie intake vs. the cost/benefit of replacing those calories.
Dan Patrick: What was your reaction to [Urban Meyer being hired]? Brady Hoke: You know.....not....good.
I have a hard time brooking arguments about low cost food supplies. I can't stand noxious, elitist "farm-to-table" or anti-GMO policy positions that would significantly increase the cost of food in this country and decrease availability. And what's more, these are mostly "progressives" making these arguments that would very directly and very surely negatively impact poor folks.
In my experience its mostly well-to-do, bored, stay at home moms with more time and money than common sense, regardless of political leaning. The same general swath of society that houses the Anti-Vaxer movement.
Look, I am all in favor of getting under corporate America's skirt on the quality of processed food...but this anti-GMO stuff is crap. GMOs are feeding the world, and nobody that's munching on treebark is terribly concerned about .0001 parts per million of pesticide in a potato.
And I say this as an unabashed Chipolte addict....beating entropy to the punch on that. :D
Look on the bright side, Talent. Socialism is, at most, maybe two generations away, and Socialism has an excellent track record when it comes to curing obesity (e.g. The Ukraine was completely cured of obesity in the 1930s!).
want to change people's weight? Change insurance. Give rewards in terms of lower deductibles for healthy habits like walking. Impact people's wallets and they'll change. Right now, there is no difference in most insurance plans between a person who eats healthier and a person who eats poorly.
Grammar... The difference between feeling your nuts and feeling you're nuts.
Tweet
Comment