Well, MI is the nation's COVID hot-spot on Sunday, 4/11. It must be because the press is telling us how bad things are. For those of you living there, this news has undoubtedly been depressing.
I post on another forum where, among other things, there's a lot of COVID talk. This took me about an hour researching available trackers. Even the FL PH Department's web site lacks data that I wanted to present so I used JHU trackers. Something I've known for a while now is that there's no consistency in the depth that COVID data trackers go to except for one and that is new case numbers. So, of course, the press uses this to tell us how bad things are. Anyway, here's FL's data presented with a different slant in a post I made elasehere today:
I mentioned yesterday that the impact of COVID is likely less than we are led to believe it is. A lot of this has to do with how public health officials report COVD data and then how the press presents it to us.
Giving us case numbers out of context is misleading. For example, on 3/9, FL reported 5007 new cases. A month later, on 4/9, 6817. That's a 36% increase in new cases yet the percent positivity over that same period went up only 1%. When you test more, more new cases are identified...... testing on 3/9 = 175/100K. Testing on 4/9 = 282/100K. That's a 37% increase in daily testing producing an expected 36% in new cases.
On 3/9, FL had 3419 patients hospitalized with a COVID diagnosis. On 4/9, 3016.
But this is the kicker - deaths:
Deaths.JPG
Need I say more? Florida is fine.
I suspect if I did this for MI, it would produce similar results.
I post on another forum where, among other things, there's a lot of COVID talk. This took me about an hour researching available trackers. Even the FL PH Department's web site lacks data that I wanted to present so I used JHU trackers. Something I've known for a while now is that there's no consistency in the depth that COVID data trackers go to except for one and that is new case numbers. So, of course, the press uses this to tell us how bad things are. Anyway, here's FL's data presented with a different slant in a post I made elasehere today:
I mentioned yesterday that the impact of COVID is likely less than we are led to believe it is. A lot of this has to do with how public health officials report COVD data and then how the press presents it to us.
Giving us case numbers out of context is misleading. For example, on 3/9, FL reported 5007 new cases. A month later, on 4/9, 6817. That's a 36% increase in new cases yet the percent positivity over that same period went up only 1%. When you test more, more new cases are identified...... testing on 3/9 = 175/100K. Testing on 4/9 = 282/100K. That's a 37% increase in daily testing producing an expected 36% in new cases.
On 3/9, FL had 3419 patients hospitalized with a COVID diagnosis. On 4/9, 3016.
But this is the kicker - deaths:
Deaths.JPG
Need I say more? Florida is fine.
I suspect if I did this for MI, it would produce similar results.
Comment