And this should go without saying, but the problem with Twitter/Parler/etc is that they are private actors. They aren't otherwise subject to the 1st A. However, they are functioning in an important public discourse role. This is a way around that.
Announcement
Collapse
Please support the Forum by using the Amazon Link this Holiday Season
Amazon has started their Black Friday sales and there are some great deals to be had! As you shop this holiday season, please consider using the forum's Amazon.com link (listed in the menu as "Amazon Link") to add items to your cart and purchase them. The forum gets a small commission from every item sold.
Additionally, the forum gets a "bounty" for various offers at Amazon.com. For instance, if you sign up for a 30 day free trial of Amazon Prime, the forum will earn $3. Same if you buy a Prime membership for someone else as a gift! Trying out or purchasing an Audible membership will earn the forum a few bucks. And creating an Amazon Business account will send a $15 commission our way.
If you have an Amazon Echo, you need a free trial of Amazon Music!! We will earn $3 and it's free to you!
Your personal information is completely private, I only get a list of items that were ordered/shipped via the link, no names or locations or anything. This does not cost you anything extra and it helps offset the operating costs of this forum, which include our hosting fees and the yearly registration and licensing fees.
Stay safe and well and thank you for your participation in the Forum and for your support!! --Deborah
Here is the link:
Click here to shop at Amazon.com
Additionally, the forum gets a "bounty" for various offers at Amazon.com. For instance, if you sign up for a 30 day free trial of Amazon Prime, the forum will earn $3. Same if you buy a Prime membership for someone else as a gift! Trying out or purchasing an Audible membership will earn the forum a few bucks. And creating an Amazon Business account will send a $15 commission our way.
If you have an Amazon Echo, you need a free trial of Amazon Music!! We will earn $3 and it's free to you!
Your personal information is completely private, I only get a list of items that were ordered/shipped via the link, no names or locations or anything. This does not cost you anything extra and it helps offset the operating costs of this forum, which include our hosting fees and the yearly registration and licensing fees.
Stay safe and well and thank you for your participation in the Forum and for your support!! --Deborah
Here is the link:
Click here to shop at Amazon.com
See more
See less
Miscellaneous And Off Topic Subjects
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by iam416 View Post
I actually don't have to sort out anything. I just have to say -- you in or you out. A company that is likely to use 230 will know that. A company that is not will know that. Twitter, Parler, YT -- they need 230. AWS does not (as I mentioned to DSL, they're very far away from liability). Hell, I don't think Apple and Google need 230.
But, if you give 1st A application to the direct publishers then the AWS/Apple/Google issues go away. There is no "conservative" twitter or "liberal" twitter -- there's just twitters. You can ban Parler, but the people on Parler can go to Twitter and say the same thing. You can't ban them all --realistically.
So, in practice the Apps would have to abide by the 1st A. That means they could still ban misleading commecial speech, pornography and words that incite imminent lawless action (and a few other categories). HOWEVER, if they did do that they are potentially answerable in Court. The user would have recourse to figure out if the App acted properly.
The general policy idea of 230 is to further this on-line public marketplace of ideas. We recognized that importance of these services as on-line places for public discourse and wanted to foster that discource by exempting the "hosts" from liability -- the users, of course, are still liable, but the hosts -- no. If there was potential liability then the concern was the hosts would be overly-censorious as a way to avoid liability (plus, added costs). I think what I set forth pretty well captures the spirit and purpose of 230.
- Top
Comment
-
-
-
I'm amazed and pleased to see that the right's efforts to quash the "defund" and "eliminate" law enforcement agencies have succeeded. All it took was for a few nutjobs to "attack" the Capitol and make a few Democrats uncomfortable, and all that stupid talk went away. I daresay there's not a city council in America today, that will even put that discussion on their agenda for a while. Shoot, this may even be a great time for the various National Guard units throughout the country to secure a bit of extra funding from Congress.
Sometimes, even when you lose, you win."The stockings were hung by the chimney with care, .. I'd worn them for weeks, and they needed the air"
- Top
Comment
-
Fox News says there are more National Guardsmen in Washington DC now, than there are troops in Afghanistan and Iraq right now.
Dem/Libs have amazingly become "the party of law enforcement" very quickly.
Wonders will never cease."The stockings were hung by the chimney with care, .. I'd worn them for weeks, and they needed the air"
- Top
Comment
Comment