Whatever the motives you thing these big donors have, they are for open immigration or some sort of immigration reform. It isn't a shadowy conspiracy. To expect them to suppress their feelings to get behind Trump when they have spent hundreds of millions of dollars is wishful thinking. Especially when Trump is not dominating the voting and it isn't a winning general election issue.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Miscellaneous And Off Topic Subjects
Collapse
X
-
Paul Finebaum, the popular SEC Network radio host earlier this year dubbed Harbaugh the Donald Trump of college football.
Harbaugh takes Trump comparison as compliment, Harbaugh was asked about the comparison before speaking to Detroit high school coaches at the Horatio Williams Foundation function.
He's not afraid to fight the establishment," Harbaugh said. "In that regard I will take that as a compliment."
- Top
Comment
-
Now we know where Don gets his kick ass foreign policy:
Partway through a Trump Tower interview with two dozen reporters and ultra-Orthodox activists Thursday afternoon, the leading Republican candidate for president deferred to a real estate attorney for help answering a question about Israel. “Jason, how would you respond to that?” Trump asked, gesturing to the chief legal officer of the Trump Organization, Jason Greenblatt....
- Top
Comment
-
Especially in places like Saudi Arabia, which we have helped make rich with oil money and who we defended from Saddam Hussein in 1991. We're sick and tired of being told that we shouldn't look out for our own interests but it's perfectly okay for everyone else to do so.
A good example of the Saudi attitude toward the US:
The radical change in the balance of power in carbon-based energy production has made SA less necessary as an ally. Disruptive technology disrupts foreign policy too.
The potential shakedown by Saudi, or China for that matter, is one totally predictable result of the US being $ 19 trillion in debt. The borrower is usually the slave of the lender, unless the borrower has taken so much money that the lender cannot enforce its debt. In the 1960s, we were already talking of a large national debt being a weapon in foreign policy.Last edited by Da Geezer; April 16, 2016, 10:10 AM.
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dr. Strangelove View PostI hope sometime in my lifetime we finally tell the Saudis to fuck offOriginally posted by froot loops View PostNot likely
It has be over 40 years since the oil crisis. We put a man on the moon in less than 10 years but we haven't been able to come up with an alternative source of energy in 4 times that long? *sigh*I feel like I am watching the destruction of our democracy while my neighbors and friends cheer it on
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by lineygoblue View PostIf the tree huggers would let us frack the crap out of the country like we should be able to, we could tell Saudi Arabia to frack off in less than 10 years. But noooooooo....I feel like I am watching the destruction of our democracy while my neighbors and friends cheer it on
- Top
Comment
-
CGVT said:
It has be over 40 years since the oil crisis. We put a man on the moon in less than 10 years but we haven't been able to come up with an alternative source of energy in 4 times that long? *sigh*
The US is now the largest producer of oil and gas in the world. It makes sense to use what we have in terms of resources. It also makes a lot of sense to have other countries subsidize the development of alternative energy, and for the US to buy or steal the technology in 100 years or so.
If you think fracking is a disruptive technology, what would happen if we were able to harness nuclear fusion?Last edited by Da Geezer; April 16, 2016, 05:04 PM.
- Top
Comment
-
That's good. The rest of the world has a lot of incentive to develop alternatives. That is great. No sense in having the US waste money in that development. One immutable rule of business is "pioneers pay the most".
I did notice this week that US corn imports are up 56%, and the price of corn continues to rise even though the last couple of years have been large crops. If ethanol were not mandated for use in autos, what would the real price of corn be? I'm old enough to remember when oil companies charged for putting lead into gas. Then they were mandated to take it out of gas, and we paid more for that. Now I suppose we will have to pay extra for gasoline without ethanol. We would have been better off without government intervention. Our fuel would be cheaper per mile, and our food costs would also be lower.
- Top
Comment
Comment