OK, polsters, this is the view from across the pond and in GB:
To have any real chance of re-election, Mr Trump will have to benefit from a pro-Republican bias in the electoral college. In 2016 he attracted 2.9m fewer votes than Hillary Clinton, yet secured 77 more electoral votes and the presidency. That’s because his vote margin was three percentage points higher in Wisconsin, the state that gave him his 270th electoral vote, than his performance nationwide (excluding third parties).
A similar gap will probably reappear this year. Our election model figures that Mr Biden is currently winning about 54.2% of the two-party vote nationwide—a margin of 8.4 points. He is ahead by 4.8 points in Florida, by 5.8 in Pennsylvania and by 6.4 in Wisconsin, the states most likely to determine the outcome in November. Those leads are smaller than his national margin by 3.6, 2.6 and 2.0 points respectively. These relative gaps between Mr Biden’s state and national margins are 14% smaller, on average, than Mrs Clinton’s gaps in those states in 2016. This means that Mr Trump’s relative advantage in the electoral college has shrunk over the past four years, making it slightly harder for him to repeat his previous minoritarian victory. With a victory in the popular vote looking highly unlikely, that leaves Mr Trump with a very difficult road back to the White House.
From the "Checks and Balances" articles of the Economist.
To have any real chance of re-election, Mr Trump will have to benefit from a pro-Republican bias in the electoral college. In 2016 he attracted 2.9m fewer votes than Hillary Clinton, yet secured 77 more electoral votes and the presidency. That’s because his vote margin was three percentage points higher in Wisconsin, the state that gave him his 270th electoral vote, than his performance nationwide (excluding third parties).
A similar gap will probably reappear this year. Our election model figures that Mr Biden is currently winning about 54.2% of the two-party vote nationwide—a margin of 8.4 points. He is ahead by 4.8 points in Florida, by 5.8 in Pennsylvania and by 6.4 in Wisconsin, the states most likely to determine the outcome in November. Those leads are smaller than his national margin by 3.6, 2.6 and 2.0 points respectively. These relative gaps between Mr Biden’s state and national margins are 14% smaller, on average, than Mrs Clinton’s gaps in those states in 2016. This means that Mr Trump’s relative advantage in the electoral college has shrunk over the past four years, making it slightly harder for him to repeat his previous minoritarian victory. With a victory in the popular vote looking highly unlikely, that leaves Mr Trump with a very difficult road back to the White House.
From the "Checks and Balances" articles of the Economist.
Comment