Mueller himself makes that point in the report. Absent provable corrupt intent to obstruct an ongoing investigation, rather than mere shouting at the walls and random anger directed at embarrassing revelations, a prosecution would fall flat.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Miscellaneous And Off Topic Subjects
Collapse
X
-
So, the bottom line is that there is literally nothing different from the conclusions in the "Barr" memo. Absolutely NO evidence of collusion. Not "beyond reasonable doubt" technicality. NO. FUCKING. EVIDENCE. And there was at least some evidene of obstruction concerning a fairy tale crime, but the evidence is inconclusive, at best.
That's where we are.Dan Patrick: What was your reaction to [Urban Meyer being hired]?
Brady Hoke: You know.....not....good.
- Top
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Clear Mueller spent 0 hours looking at the other side. No mention of Christopher Steele working for Fusion and Clinton campaign in the 14 mentions of the dossier, no mention of Natalia Veselnitskaya's meeting with Glenn Simpson before and after the Trump tower meeting, cites Trump's characterization of the dossier as "an absolute disgrace" as potential evidence that he obstructed justice.Last edited by Kapture1; April 18, 2019, 02:06 PM.
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by iam416 View PostSo, the bottom line is that there is literally nothing different from the conclusions in the "Barr" memo. Absolutely NO evidence of collusion. Not "beyond reasonable doubt" technicality. NO. FUCKING. EVIDENCE. And there was at least some evidene of obstruction concerning a fairy tale crime, but the evidence is inconclusive, at best.
That's where we are.
- Top
Comment
-
Mueller doesn't draw a conclusion one way or the other. It's my impression that Barr went out of his way today to implore the public to understand it from Trump's point of view, and understand he was frustrated and angry over an investigation he considered a witch hunt.
The more you read Part II of the Report, do you really and truly think Barr hasn't downplayed that portion of the report? He hasn't been portraying the findings in an unerringly positive direction for Trump?
Mueller openly said the obstruction question is more properly dealt with by Congress because it's the President and not an ordinary joe off the streets we're talking about here. From what I could tell, Barr pretty much denied Mueller claimed any such thing. Said it would be 'unfortunate' if Mueller believed that.
- Top
Comment
-
"The report does effectively exonerate PDJT on firing Comey."
anybody who uses salacious and unverified dossier (comeys quote) as the main reason to initiate a fisa warrant (Comeys action in signing the first Fisa application))
is going to be first head on the block when the instigatorsrs start being investigated
- Top
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by crashcourse View Post"The report does effectively exonerate PDJT on firing Comey."
anybody who uses salacious and unverified dossier (comeys quote) as the main reason to initiate a fisa warrant (Comeys action in signing the first Fisa application))
is going to be first head on the block when the instigatorsrs start being investigated
And no, like we said, voters don't give any more of a shit about that than the Mueller Report itself.
If Trump thinks running against James Comey and bashing immigrants as rapists is the path to victory in 2020, then I say Godspeed, sir.
- Top
Comment
Comment