Announcement

Collapse

Please support the Forum by using the Amazon Link this Holiday Season

Amazon has started their Black Friday sales and there are some great deals to be had! As you shop this holiday season, please consider using the forum's Amazon.com link (listed in the menu as "Amazon Link") to add items to your cart and purchase them. The forum gets a small commission from every item sold.

Additionally, the forum gets a "bounty" for various offers at Amazon.com. For instance, if you sign up for a 30 day free trial of Amazon Prime, the forum will earn $3. Same if you buy a Prime membership for someone else as a gift! Trying out or purchasing an Audible membership will earn the forum a few bucks. And creating an Amazon Business account will send a $15 commission our way.

If you have an Amazon Echo, you need a free trial of Amazon Music!! We will earn $3 and it's free to you!

Your personal information is completely private, I only get a list of items that were ordered/shipped via the link, no names or locations or anything. This does not cost you anything extra and it helps offset the operating costs of this forum, which include our hosting fees and the yearly registration and licensing fees.

Stay safe and well and thank you for your participation in the Forum and for your support!! --Deborah

Here is the link:
Click here to shop at Amazon.com
See more
See less

Miscellaneous And Off Topic Subjects

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Dr. Strangelove View Post
    Jeff- The worrisome thing for me is that I have low confidence that Trump wlll not meddle in the FAA's decision. And that he will ultimately make the call based on how much he likes/dislikes Boeing's President and not anything rooted in facts. He could pressure the FAA to ground them baselessly, he could pressure them to keep them in the skies and ignore genuine concerns. No matter which way it goes the WH can't really deny Trump stayed out of it anymore.
    And on a similar note, how about we wait until we have actual evidence about what happened to the plane that went down? It is supposed to come in today. Let's see if the crash was owing to a defect in the plane, or due to maintenance problems. Why does someone have to be guilty until proven innocent, even if it a hated big business. Waiting one day to collect evidence is fair to Boeing.

    Comment


    • I thought I'd find discussion about the payment-to-get-in scandal that was announced by the FBI yesterday as it pertains to college admissions. I suspect the absence of discussion is due to the perps being Democrats or Democrat activists.

      Imagine sitting down with your child and explaining to them that you are going to pay someone to cheat on the SAT or ACT for them so that they can get into a college you want them to get into.

      At least UoM is not involved. The Michigan degree has been so depreciated post-Baake that no one would pay to get one.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Da Geezer View Post

        Well, froot, as I am likely to do, I read the whole article. You posted: "Here is the expose the Herald published in December. It gets into the whole case. It has the accusations of Dershowitz having sex with underage girls. It also stars Kenneth Starr. In regards to the victims not being notified, here is a snippet of it:"

        Could you cut and paste the part of the article that has the accusations against Dershowitz? I couldn't find it.

        As part of your continuing education, let me tell you about what has been called "The Star Chamber". These were courts that originated under Henry VII and were extensively used under Henry VIII. They were courts of great efficiency. Unfortunately, they started with the presumption of guilt and the accused had a right to prove his innocence. What is notable is that anyone who helped in the accused defense, particularly lawyers, was also charged with the same crime as the accused.

        Now you and your progressive statists arguing that if Dershowitz or Ken Star, act as defense counsel for Epstein, they are suddenly "involved" in Epstein's crime. This is the nature of socialist crime and punishment. If an attorney represents an accused, then the attorney automatically becomes an accessory after the fact in the commission of the crime.

        The actual fact is that there is ample evidence that Epstein was a major sexual predator and should have been given far more in terms of punishment than he was given. No one condones that. But, absent any evidence at all, accusing someone BECAUSE they are helping an accused is totalitarianism.

        Did you read the article, froot? Or did you repost something that came from one of your progressive web sites?
        Find it yourself, its in there, I'm not doing the work for you because you can't figure it out. You didn't read the whole expose, duh. It shouldn't be so hard to find. Just read. Your act is thin, nobody should have to spoon feed you the info, find it yourself.
        Last edited by froot loops; March 13, 2019, 11:08 AM.

        Comment


        • Trump campaign manger Paul Manafort has been sentence and additional 43 months of prison time

          Comment


          • ...meanwhile Hillary roams free...
            Shut the fuck up Donny!

            Comment


            • LOL that he showed up in a wheelchair. Wiz, please let me know if Manafort ever asks to borrow your white cane. I assume that those are issued by the conferences and that refs aren't to share them with outsiders.

              Comment


              • I saw my first ever ref fan at a basketball game Monday.

                Comment


                • Comment


                  • Originally posted by hack View Post
                    LOL that he showed up in a wheelchair. Wiz, please let me know if Manafort ever asks to borrow your white cane. I assume that those are issued by the conferences and that refs aren't to share them with outsiders.
                    I don't have a white cane dumbass...it's lavender surrender...
                    Shut the fuck up Donny!

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by froot loops View Post
                      Trump campaign manger Paul Manafort has been sentence and additional 43 months of prison time

                      Judge Jackson made some very interesting comments during the sentencing. She questioned why the defense team kept bringing up "no collusion!" in its filings when that was totally irrelevant to what Manafort was actually charged with. She didn't say it outright, but she implied the defense team was wasting time trying to score political points with the 'audience of one', seeking a pardon, rather than put up a credible defense of the crimes at hand.

                      Comment


                      • Wow, what a shame. Better cut a few more Experian commercials to help defray the costs



                        Comment


                        • Manafort's 16-count indictment in the State of New York. Trump can't bail him out on this one

                          Comment


                          • j5dvxxdkgvl21.jpg?width=923&auto=webp&s=7f494a3ec415a884438fb0efba02ce1cdc94ec50.jpg

                            Comment


                            • I say we appoint a special council to see if the 0bama admin obstructed justice.
                              Former FBI lawyer Lisa Page admitted under questioning from Texas Republican Rep. John Ratcliffe last summer that "the FBI was ordered by the Obama DOJ not to consider charging Hillary Clinton for gross negligence in the handling of classified information," Ratcliffe alleged in an incendiary social media post late Tuesday.

                              Comment


                              • i4c18wai8wl21.jpg?width=1024&auto=webp&s=66fff91181715266b2300f78b58e930f378bbf05.jpg

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X