IMO, people who are doing well or well enough aren't inclined toward big change. So economic discussions may change, but I have a hard time getting away from what I consider to be a bedrock principle of politics.
Now, there's plenty of people who aren't doing well who may be fine with rolling the dice for something better. But, the problem, politically, is that a lot of those people are still white. And not just white, the dreaded white working class. The folks people on the far left look down with, in some cases, utter contempt. The folks who actually vote against self-interest because of the incessant white privilege talking points. The folks who might have or were convinced to vote for Bernie when Bernie was just talking economics.
Again, IMO, when you "big tent" as much as the Ds are big tenting, commonality of interest is really hard so you may tend toward commonality of "enemy." The Ds have two defined enemies at the moment -- Wall Street/Big Business and white males. If they just stuck with what Sanders is inclined to do -- the "socialist" part -- they'd have a very credible chance on economics. But they are Progressive "Socialists" and that means they do both. And that's a huge lifeline for the Rs. Of course, they have their own issues.
Now, there's plenty of people who aren't doing well who may be fine with rolling the dice for something better. But, the problem, politically, is that a lot of those people are still white. And not just white, the dreaded white working class. The folks people on the far left look down with, in some cases, utter contempt. The folks who actually vote against self-interest because of the incessant white privilege talking points. The folks who might have or were convinced to vote for Bernie when Bernie was just talking economics.
Again, IMO, when you "big tent" as much as the Ds are big tenting, commonality of interest is really hard so you may tend toward commonality of "enemy." The Ds have two defined enemies at the moment -- Wall Street/Big Business and white males. If they just stuck with what Sanders is inclined to do -- the "socialist" part -- they'd have a very credible chance on economics. But they are Progressive "Socialists" and that means they do both. And that's a huge lifeline for the Rs. Of course, they have their own issues.
Comment