Miscellaneous And Off Topic Subjects

[Kapture1]

Well, that's not true. You could easily raise taxes enough to cover the Progressive Socialist agenda. I mean, sure, you'd cripple the economy and it's absolutely a political non-starter, but it could be done.

cant tax people when they lose their jobs. when businesses shutter. when industries go under.

how much do we borrow right now each year? Under no circumstance can we tax people 100 trillion over 10 years

[iam416]

The NY law and the Virginia proposed law (which I doubt passes), are states doing what states want to do. Good for them. Ohio is going to pass a "heartbeat" bill (which will surely be challenged).

Meanwhile, the significant majority of Americans are pro-choice for the first trimester and pro-life for the final trimester. But, if NY and Virginia want to allow a mother to terminate a pregnancy when she's fully dilated, welp....they have to live with it. The thing about the Virginia exception is "mental health" -- I mean, WTF is that? Sounds like a catchall that is always satisfied.

[iam416]

Under no circumstance can we tax people 100 trillion over 10 years

It's not going to cost that much. But, in any event candidates are going to get their plans scored by the CBO/JCT and we'll find out what they think of them.

[Kapture1]

It's not going to cost that much. But, in any event candidates are going to get their plans scored by the CBO/JCT and we'll find out what they think of them.

sure it will. family leave, free college, free health care, and green new, along with our existing deficit, would be just about 100 trillion over 10 years.

https://www.vox.com/the-big-idea/201...deficits-taxes without the green new deal - 42.5 trillion over 10 years

https://pjmedia.com/trending/ocasio-...ost-countries/ and 49.109 trillion over 10 years for the green new deal

[Kapture1]

CNN "Journalists" taking orders from Harris' campaign. This is gonna be Hillary 2.0

https://twitter.com/KFILE/status/1090437744856317952?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1090437744856317952&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.breitbart.com%2Fpolitics%2F2019%2F01%2F29%2Fcnns-kaczynski-deletes-tweet-about-kamala-backtracking-after-campaign-pushes-back%2F

[UMStan White]

Hey Kapture do you ever come out of your basement and go to work?

[Kapture1]

Hey Kapture do you ever come out of your basement and go to work?

I'm at work, and it's fucking cold out. I would much rather be at home

[Kapture1]

also, there is no problem with spending time in your basement when it looks like this


FvzZ7C7.jpg

[Kapture1]

I mean just look at that monitor


glorious.

StvMFmC.jpg

[Ghengis Jon]

Russian stooge Trump disses intelligence community for speaking truth to power.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/30/politics/trump-intel-chiefs-foreign-policy-iran-isis-north-korea/index.html

[Kapture1]

Brennan's Legacy

[hack]

Well, that's not true. You could easily raise taxes enough to cover the Progressive Socialist agenda. I mean, sure, you'd cripple the economy and it's absolutely a political non-starter, but it could be done.

As previously indicated, higher rates are correlated with higher growth.

[iam416]

So tax to 100%. Send growth through the roof.

[iam416]

Very sharp blog entry on NRO re hundreds of studies on growth in states: https://www.nationalreview.com/corne...tive-policies/

Duh. And, another duh -- the amounts and rates matter.

Meanwhile, Elizabeth Warren and her Progressive Socialist understanding of economics is proposing a wealth tax that even Denmark and Sweden have repealed.

[Kapture1]

So tax to 100%. Send growth through the roof.

right? if 15 dollars an hour spurs economic growth with no downside, why not make it 30 an hour? Or 60, or 100? Why stop at 15?