If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
If you are having difficulty logging in, please REFRESH the page and clear your browser cache and try again.
If you still can't get logged in, please try using Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome, Firefox, Opera, or Safari to login. Also be sure you are using the latest version of your browser. Internet Explorer has not been updated in over seven years and will no longer work with the Forum software. Thanks
The fraudulent "doctor" Gorka attempts to defend Trump but the reanimated corpse once known as Lou Dobbs isn't having it. "PELOSI WHIPPED THE PRESIDENT" shrieks that which was once known as Dobbs.
Conservative commentator Ann Coulter ripped President Trump if he gave in to Democrats by signing government funding legislation that didn't include money for a border wall and warning him not to cave.
After previous remarks against Trump, Coulter pointed out that he unfollowed her on Twitter.
The wimpiest thing he did in this fiasco is change his mind and listen to Coulter. He tried to bluff his way to get a wall and it wasn't going to work.
Crash ...... my post that you responded to makes it clear that, yes, I believe the Mueller Report can provide the information that the Judiciary Committee can use to make a decision on moving forward with or not moving forward with the impeachment of Donald Trump. Will it? That depends on a couple of things. The WH has the authority to block release of all or parts of the Report on the basis of Executive Privilege or National Security, the later basis probably having the best chance of standing up to legal challenges. There's an outside chance that Mueller will be purposely vague in his findings such that individuals within Congress that have the authority to move forward with articles of impeachment cannot rely solely on his report to do that.
The rest of your questions seem immaterial to me and Jon does seem to address them as I might but frankly I don't care about any of that. I think both sides on the issue of the potential for Trump to have acted, while campaigning for the presidency or as the sitting president, in a manner that is either illegal or unconstitutional gets lost in the media's determined effort to get a scoop that turns into a hot story. IOW, I trust the process being legally undertaken by the Special Council Investigation to sort through all of that and, personally, I tend to ignore the sideline stories. As I've stated here on numerous occasions, I'm patiently waiting for Mueller's report to be released, hopefully publicly, before I'm ready to determine if Trump acted illegally or unconstitutionally. From there what Congress does with that information is up to them.
Mission to CFB's National Championship accomplished. But the shine on the NC Trophy is embarrassingly wearing off. It's M B-Ball ..... or hockey or volley ball or name your college sport favorite time ...... until next year.
Comment