If it was crystal clear what does the word regulated refer to? The military, the individual or both?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Miscellaneous And Off Topic Subjects
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Hannibal View Post
People are going to jail and seeing assets confiscated for either process "crimes" or for crimes that were completely unrelated to Donald Trump's run for president. Some people have been charged with crimes for Facebook trolling.
But just be patient, dude. Any day now the smoking gun is going to come out. Anonymous sources tell CNN that Drumpf's gardener is about to flip. Surely he has a secret recording of Putin and CheetoHitler conspiring to build a wall on the US southern border, improve GDP growth to 4%, improve the value of the stock market, pacify North Korea, increase energy exports (in competition with Russian energy exports), end birthright citizenship, renegotiate our trade deals, and cut corporate taxes in an effort to spur growth and bring back American manufacturing jobs. It is the most insidious conspiracy in the history of the world -- the crowning achievement of the lizard people!
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by AlabamAlum View PostIf you all must continue this mind-numbing discussion, could you all use the style and prose of a Texas Monthly or New Yorker article?
Jacob Howard took paper from the mahogany desk, placed it front of him, and dipped the pen to ink without even looking. The lamp's flame flickered and gave the paper a warm, golden glow. He knew if he were to finish the Citizenship Clause...
- Top
Comment
-
He had like 4 wives, all of them hags, and frequently Castled queenside whilst playing the Italian! Might deserve to be in Ogden dumbass HOF.Dan Patrick: What was your reaction to [Urban Meyer being hired]?
Brady Hoke: You know.....not....good.
- Top
Comment
-
DSL:
I had another piece in my mind that argued a little harder contra your position, but I think this NRO piece is much better in terms of setting up the issue and concluding much as I did: https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/...l-requirement/
So, you know, if someone reaches the same spot I did then, it's right! But there are two points in there that I didn't know about and which are instruction -- the 1866 Civil Rights Act is instructive as to "subject to jurisdiction" and the dicta in the Slaughterhouse case is instructive (though, not controlling).Dan Patrick: What was your reaction to [Urban Meyer being hired]?
Brady Hoke: You know.....not....good.
- Top
Comment
-
That's actually fairly terrible reasoning and represents a remarkably shallow, dare I say, twitter shallow, understanding of subject to the jurisdiction of the US. It doesn't mean the conclusion is wrong; the reasoning, though, is not good.Dan Patrick: What was your reaction to [Urban Meyer being hired]?
Brady Hoke: You know.....not....good.
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by iam416 View Post
That's actually fairly terrible reasoning and represents a remarkably shallow, dare I say, twitter shallow, understanding of subject to the jurisdiction of the US. It doesn't mean the conclusion is wrong; the reasoning, though, is not good.
rack up parking tickets with impunity. The U.S. government clearly does have jurisdiction, in this straightforward sense, over illegal immigrants; otherwise we would be powerless to deport them or or otherwise punish them for breaking our laws.
- Top
Comment
Comment