vote scheduled for Friday, Grassley denied Feinstein's request to cancel the hearing.
Announcement
Collapse
Please support the Forum by using the Amazon Link this Holiday Season
Amazon has started their Black Friday sales and there are some great deals to be had! As you shop this holiday season, please consider using the forum's Amazon.com link (listed in the menu as "Amazon Link") to add items to your cart and purchase them. The forum gets a small commission from every item sold.
Additionally, the forum gets a "bounty" for various offers at Amazon.com. For instance, if you sign up for a 30 day free trial of Amazon Prime, the forum will earn $3. Same if you buy a Prime membership for someone else as a gift! Trying out or purchasing an Audible membership will earn the forum a few bucks. And creating an Amazon Business account will send a $15 commission our way.
If you have an Amazon Echo, you need a free trial of Amazon Music!! We will earn $3 and it's free to you!
Your personal information is completely private, I only get a list of items that were ordered/shipped via the link, no names or locations or anything. This does not cost you anything extra and it helps offset the operating costs of this forum, which include our hosting fees and the yearly registration and licensing fees.
Stay safe and well and thank you for your participation in the Forum and for your support!! --Deborah
Here is the link:
Click here to shop at Amazon.com
Additionally, the forum gets a "bounty" for various offers at Amazon.com. For instance, if you sign up for a 30 day free trial of Amazon Prime, the forum will earn $3. Same if you buy a Prime membership for someone else as a gift! Trying out or purchasing an Audible membership will earn the forum a few bucks. And creating an Amazon Business account will send a $15 commission our way.
If you have an Amazon Echo, you need a free trial of Amazon Music!! We will earn $3 and it's free to you!
Your personal information is completely private, I only get a list of items that were ordered/shipped via the link, no names or locations or anything. This does not cost you anything extra and it helps offset the operating costs of this forum, which include our hosting fees and the yearly registration and licensing fees.
Stay safe and well and thank you for your participation in the Forum and for your support!! --Deborah
Here is the link:
Click here to shop at Amazon.com
See more
See less
Miscellaneous And Off Topic Subjects
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Kapture1 View Post
not if they are already receiving federal protections as a public utility. i can complain all i want.
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dr. Strangelove View Post
They currently are not regarded as such. Instagram is not, for instance, a public utility under the law. I notice plenty of articles from the Far Right demanding they be controlled as such, however.
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by froot loops View PostIn what way is Facebook or Google or Twitter receiving federal protections as a public utility?
unlike facebook, AT&T isn't banning people from their ssrvice because of their opinions.
- Top
Comment
-
The other side knew about it too, and had its 65 women ready to vouch. None of this is remotely convincing, Talent. If you care about this you'd have to be a hell of a lot more upset about Pizzagate, Seth Rich, Vince Foster and all the other nonsense cooked up to smear Ds. Say what you will about a 35-year-old allegation but at least it's not a complete fabrication. Once again your claims of basing your opinion on any sort of principle are clearly nonsense since you apply them in such a lopsided way.
- Top
Comment
-
Let's say I accept the argument that Facebook is so huge and so overwhelmingly dominates its industry, that it is the only platform on which you can publish and be heard by huge numbers.
Well, so what? What's the basis for government intervention? The First Amendment guarantees you no audience. Let's say this was 1960. There were 3 tv networks and a bunch of radio stations. Would a communist have a solid case that he was being oppressed because he has to shout on a street corner and doesn't get invites to speak on tv? Obviously not. So I don't see it as oppression or 'silencing' that's any more serious than in the past if Facebook says, yeah, your white nationalism ain't welcome here, champ. Try Gab instead.
If Comcast starts saying "We're going to block all the platforms, apps, and sites used by white nationalists", THEN we got a problem. But again, the champions of ending net neutrality praised handing over such discretion back to private industry.
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by hack View PostThe other side knew about it too, and had its 65 women ready to vouch. None of this is remotely convincing, Talent. If you care about this you'd have to be a hell of a lot more upset about Pizzagate, Seth Rich, Vince Foster and all the other nonsense cooked up to smear Ds. Say what you will about a 35-year-old allegation but at least it's not a complete fabrication. Once again your claims of basing your opinion on any sort of principle are clearly nonsense since you apply them in such a lopsided way.
id say an hour, tops.
- Top
Comment
Comment