Part of the problem is that (excluding Afganistan and Iraq) the US has over 800 overseas military facilities around the world according to the GAO. You don't think the US can maintain/project its power with only, say, 400 facilities? Cheese and rice, slash the military budget. There is tons of fat there. Candidates are chest pounding neanderthals looking to lob un-American accusations at anyone who might disagree.
Wake me up when candidates actual state clearly and consisely what they will do about specific issues if elected. I'm about sick of all the soundbites and red meat drivel for the so-called base.
Why don't they have a "positional" instead of "debate"? Each candidate is paraded before a microphone and gets 10 minutes. Ground rules are simple: (one) candidate may not refer to or speak about another candidate or incumbent of either party, (two) candidates must state clear positions on issues, (three) must provide details on how their policies would be implemented and the impact on the citizenry. Then the next week candidates can actually debate each other based upon the positions stated previously.
Or you could make me king and I'll rapidly address the professional politician issue...
Wake me up when candidates actual state clearly and consisely what they will do about specific issues if elected. I'm about sick of all the soundbites and red meat drivel for the so-called base.
Why don't they have a "positional" instead of "debate"? Each candidate is paraded before a microphone and gets 10 minutes. Ground rules are simple: (one) candidate may not refer to or speak about another candidate or incumbent of either party, (two) candidates must state clear positions on issues, (three) must provide details on how their policies would be implemented and the impact on the citizenry. Then the next week candidates can actually debate each other based upon the positions stated previously.
Or you could make me king and I'll rapidly address the professional politician issue...
Comment