The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that states cannot completely bar people from wearing T-shirts, buttons or other apparel bearing political messages in polling sites in a challenge to a 1912 Minnesota law. Michigan has a similar law that has worked well - no political stuff on display when in the polling area. The Minny law has worked fine for over a 100 years until GOP activists decided that not allowing partisan hyperbola literally in the voting area somehow was an infringement of their right to free speech.
The SCOTUS pushed the issue back to a lower court. I saw nothing wrong with the Minnesota ban. Performing your solemn duty to vote should not be marred by partisan images and demagoguery at the polls. That's only a short step away from voter intimidation.
The SCOTUS got it wrong. Not on a Dred Scott level like the Citizen's United case, but wrong nonetheless.
The SCOTUS pushed the issue back to a lower court. I saw nothing wrong with the Minnesota ban. Performing your solemn duty to vote should not be marred by partisan images and demagoguery at the polls. That's only a short step away from voter intimidation.
The SCOTUS got it wrong. Not on a Dred Scott level like the Citizen's United case, but wrong nonetheless.
Comment