Miscellaneous And Off Topic Subjects

[Kapture1]

No, it's not that. Just a concerted effort to keep negative Trump news in the forefront. Trump needs no help in being a front page shit-for-brains.

It actually is just that. I wouldn't expect a rabid member of the base to see it that way, but there is no denying it.

[CGVT]

*yawn*

[Kapture1]

?\_(ツ)_/?


No evidence of collusion, so let's sue for collusion.

makes sense. totally.



DRUMPF WILL BE DONE FOR SURE!!!

[SeattleLionsFan]

I don’t understand this “no evidence of collusion” you keep bringing up. There is no direct evidence that has been seen by the public, but there is plenty of evidence that coordination could be inferred. The Russians said they wanted to help trump. Trump welcomed the help. Trump has long and deep connections to shady characters, including kremlin connected oligarchs. Manafort is in deep hock to Russian mobsters. Roger Stone directly communicated with email hackers.

There’s plenty of evidence. Maybe not conclusive, but there is plenty of evidence.

[Whitley]

Dems file lawsuit alleging conspiracy between Trump campaign (not Trump), WikiLeaks, and Russia.

Jeez you guys, let Mueller do his job and let the chips fall where they may. You're stooping to Trump level and not helping anything or anyone. Acting like GOP Lite.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/20/polit...sia/index.html

That is all most Dems know how to be. GOP-lite.

[Kapture1]

I don?t understand this ?no evidence of collusion? you keep bringing up. There is no direct evidence that has been seen by the public, but there is plenty of evidence that coordination could be inferred. The Russians said they wanted to help trump. Trump welcomed the help. Trump has long and deep connections to shady characters, including kremlin connected oligarchs. Manafort is in deep hock to Russian mobsters. Roger Stone directly communicated with email hackers.

There?s plenty of evidence. Maybe not conclusive, but there is plenty of evidence.

correct, there is no evidence that has been seen by the public, because there has been no evidence seen by Mueller and his crew.


If he had it, we would know.

what you claim is "evidence" isn't. Which is why I can play a montage right now of high ranking democrats on investigative committees that have stated "we have seen no evidence of collusion with Russia"

There is no actual evidence of Trump Russia collusion. Period.

[SeattleLionsFan]

Nuh-uh isn’t much of a response. Tell me why those are not evidence from which collusion could be inferred.

[Kapture1]

Nuh-uh isn?t much of a response. Tell me why those are not evidence from which collusion could be inferred.

because collusion is to be proved, not inferred.

you are the one making the charge... prove it.

[Kapture1]

[ame]https://twitter.com/AP/status/987453536328912897[/ame]

[Kapture1]

[CGVT]

*yawn*

[Dr. Strangelove]

[ame]https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/987679850545778689[/ame]

[ame]https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/987679852345135105[/ame]

"Michael's a dear dear friend. You know, a lot of people, they will tell lies and make up crazy stories to get out of trouble. I don't think Michael's like that but...everyone be ready to not believe a word he says! Love ya, Mikey!"

[The Oracle]

He should at least write his own tweets, fucking fat, lazy bastard.

[Dr. Strangelove]

Failing New York Times 3rd rate reporter thinks I don't love Cohen? I love the guy! Even if he flips and makes up stories (which he won't do if he's smart). But seriously he has his own businesses and I barely know the guy

[Ghengis Jon]

An entertaining article on the motives of Ted Cruz. I read the hard copy Time piece referenced, and it is pretty ass licking.

https://edition.cnn.com/2018/04/19/politics/ted-cruz-donald-trump-time-magazine/index.html