Miscellaneous And Off Topic Subjects

[iam416]

The fate of public education under the Progs? Yes. http://www.weeklystandard.com/inside...ticle/2011402#

[Kapture1]

The fate of public education under the Progs? Yes. http://www.weeklystandard.com/inside...ticle/2011402#

[iam416]

Heh. Progs.

[Ghengis Jon]

Environmental Protection Agency administrator Scott Pruitt changes his skin from speaking honestly (Feb 11, 2016) to last week's transformation into an unashamed ass licker.

"I think he's (Trump) an empty vessel when it comes to things like the Constitution and rule of law," Pruitt said on the "Exploring Energy" radio show on February 11. "I'm very concerned that perhaps if he's in the White House, that there may be a very blunt instrument as the voice of the Constitution."

Now that he has a cushy appointed job, insuring both he and the agency does nothing....

"After meeting him, and now having the honor of working for him, it is abundantly clear that President Trump is the most consequential leader of our time," Pruitt said. "No one has done more to advance the rule of law than President Trump. The President has liberated our country from the political class and given America back to the people."

[iam416]

Pruitt is doing a great job.

[Da Geezer]

Pruitt is indeed doing a good job.

"After meeting him, and now having the honor of working for him, it is abundantly clear that President Trump is the most consequential leader of our time," Pruitt said. "No one has done more to advance the rule of law than President Trump. The President has liberated our country from the political class and given America back to the people."

The core of what progs hate is the rule of law. They cannot achieve a governing majority in elections, so they opt for rule by bureaucratic decree or rule by progressive federal district Judges. I doubt if there are many here who had good things to say about Trump in February of 2016.

[Jeff Buchanan]

Dow down 4.1% (1046 points at this posting).

I blame trump.

BUY!!!!

[THE_WIZARD_]

Dow down 4.1% (1046 points at this posting).

I blame trump.

BUY!!!!

Heavy profit taking going on...all should be about flushed out now...time to corner the FCOJ market now...

[hack]

When E.F. Wizard speaks, people listen.

[Da Geezer]

Evidently, Rep. Jerold Waddler, a member of the Intelligence Committee, has leaked a "letter" in which he attempts to give the Dem response to the Nunes memo. This is an analysis of the letter and how it makes statements that are contrary to normal warrant-seeking.

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/456093/jerrold-nadler-memo-rebuttal-weak-unpersuasive

[hack]

The NRO seems pretty conflicted about what to say about the Nunes Memo. There's a fig-leaf extended out to its facts-based readership acknowledging its failure (http://www.nationalreview.com/articl...esnt-make-case), but even in that it fails to bring up some of the basics, such as that it was the Bush campaign that hired Steele, and that it's normal everyday stuff for the researcher's client to change as the campaign progresses. Or that collusion was already proved, though over the relatively minor issue of the Ukraine plank of the party platform. We're not on to much more serious investigations of policy outcomes for sale.

All of it is noise anyways. There's an investigation because an investigation is needed. Whether it results in a sufficient amount of indictments is another issue.

[THE_WIZARD_]

When E.F. Wizard speaks, people listen.

Well sounds to me like you two a couple a bookies...

I told you he'd understand...

[Jeff Buchanan]

........All of it is noise anyways. There's an investigation because an investigation is needed. Whether it results in a sufficient amount of indictments is another issue.

You're much better at drilling down to the fundamentals here and in basketball than in football .... heh.

[Kapture1]

The NRO seems pretty conflicted about what to say about the Nunes Memo. There's a fig-leaf extended out to its facts-based readership acknowledging its failure (http://www.nationalreview.com/articl...esnt-make-case), but even in that it fails to bring up some of the basics, such as that it was the Bush campaign that hired Steele, and that it's normal everyday stuff for the researcher's client to change as the campaign progresses. Or that collusion was already proved, though over the relatively minor issue of the Ukraine plank of the party platform. We're not on to much more serious investigations of policy outcomes for sale.

All of it is noise anyways. There's an investigation because an investigation is needed. Whether it results in a sufficient amount of indictments is another issue.

The Bush campaign didn't hire Steele. I suggest that you start over, with the basic facts.

[iam416]

Progs aren’t all that interested in facts, though.