If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
If you are having difficulty logging in, please REFRESH the page and clear your browser cache and try again.
If you still can't get logged in, please try using Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome, Firefox, Opera, or Safari to login. Also be sure you are using the latest version of your browser. Internet Explorer has not been updated in over seven years and will no longer work with the Forum software. Thanks
Let's move abruptly to have this discussion on an appropriate level, if most of us are amenable? My response above was intentionally as stupid as the post SLF was replying to. Each country has its own set of factors. Norway's resources-to-population ratio is off the charts and its success as a socialist democracy holds no takeaways for anyone else. Norwegians are just lucky.
IMO it's a question of finding the sweet spot between markets and capitalism, and determining what outcomes should be market outcomes and what outcomes should not. That's basic Adam Smith there. He didn't believe the invisible hand applied to as many things as Americans do today. But an intelligent debate first needs participants that understand the difference between markets, which are pro-competition, and capitalism, which is anti-competitive. If some people want to call that socialism, then I like socialism. If people want to instead just take the ideas for what they are, and forget the crude labeling, that's even better.
If none of the activity was illegal then it begs the question why these folks were lying about the contact with the Russians. Kapture might be right that an incoming president and his NSA have a right to undermine the acting administration sanctions, but codify it into law. Remove the Logan Act
Maybe inauguration should happen the next day, but as it is actively trying to undermine the existing administration goes against the tradition of one president at a time. If Kapture is right I fully expect Trump to argue that, but we have to see what Flynn testifies to as he is fully in cooperating with Special Counsel Mueller.
the difference between markets, which are pro-competition, and capitalism, which is anti-competitive.
IMO, if you're going to rightfully push for nuance and high-level discussion, then you ought to clarify statements like this. Capitalism is, ultimately, anti-competitive if played to the end. But, for a large portion of any market life it's absolutely pro-competitive. I mean, I can pull definitions from practically everywhere that says that capitalism includes pro-competitive markets.
Saying that capitalism is non-competitive in a blanket fashion is surely the easiest way to get lost in the forest of an argument that doesn't particularly matter to your overall post.
My advice, of course, is worth exactly how much it costs. So, there's that.
Dan Patrick: What was your reaction to [Urban Meyer being hired]? Brady Hoke: You know.....not....good.
Correct. To be clear, my statement included *if* -- I will never rule out any type of DJT behavior, success, failure, asshattery, whatever -- ever again. If someone tells me he paid Putin $1B to interfere, sure -- I can believe that. If someone tells me he manages to get re-fucking-elected, sure -- why the fuck not.
My comment is only on the foreign contacts stuff.
Dan Patrick: What was your reaction to [Urban Meyer being hired]? Brady Hoke: You know.....not....good.
California is the leading engine of the US economy by far
Yeah, it's an interesting conundrum they have. But, no doubt -- NoCal, in particular, is disproportionately important and, in terms of VC, hugely important w/ any relative qualifiers.
The State, itself, is in less good shape.
Dan Patrick: What was your reaction to [Urban Meyer being hired]? Brady Hoke: You know.....not....good.
If this is all about transition contacts then the whole thing is hot fucking garbage.
If it moves into campaign contacts...?
I'm pretty confident that more is coming because I seriously doubt they'd offer Flynn a deal over a lying charge that they could've easily gotten a conviction over. If Flynn was also what they viewed as the last major player, the 'kingpin' if you will, they wouldn't have offered him any deals either.
More than likely Kushner's the one that should be most worried right now. But who knows
I'd really like to know more about how Flynn and Trump met and how he rose to prominence. Was is it because Flynn carried a grudge against Obama too? I've never seen a good story on how he attached to the campaign.
Correct. To be clear, my statement included *if* -- I will never rule out any type of DJT behavior, success, failure, asshattery, whatever -- ever again. If someone tells me he paid Putin $1B to interfere, sure -- I can believe that. If someone tells me he manages to get re-fucking-elected, sure -- why the fuck not.
My comment is only on the foreign contacts stuff.
In my opinion the money laundering and obstruction of justice has been much more likely to be proven than something that resembles collusion. All of the people who have been interviewed by Mueller have got to be sweating.
Comment