Originally posted by entropy
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Miscellaneous And Off Topic Subjects
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by iam416 View PostAu contraire. Hartsfield has been funneling money to SEC recruiting endeavors for years. I wouldn't go through security with more than $10 in cash lest you want it to end up in the hands of the next Alabama hell-raising DT manchild.
Is it really any surprise that an Alabamaniac is pushing increased forfeiture?
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by SeattleLionsFan View PostAllowing CFF in lieu of prosecution seems awfully close to allowing people to buy thier way out of convictions. (Not that it doesn't already happen)
CFF is a terrible idea all around.
Its definitely sketch.
- Top
Comment
-
Strange:So your essential argument is the only people who are capable of judging Trump objectively are people who donated to Trump or voted for him or have pledged everlasting loyalty to him.
1. I can't imagine any situation in which a competent lawyer has not represented both Dems and Rep.
2. Donating to or working for the Dem party for a length of time is a far different thing, though. It shows a level of commitment.
3. Mueller is charged with avoiding the "appearance of impropriety" as part of his job description. Once you hire ONLY donors or members of the "shadow government" that was one purpose of the Clinton Foundation, regular folks see that as improper.
And Hillary's known crimes are relevant to this discussion because the fact that they were never "investigated" lends credibility to what is obvious-that there is a different standard applied to Reps than to Dems. This goes to the heart of "the appearance of impropriety".
Besides, why not hire a liberal Republican, just for appearances.
- Top
Comment
-
Hey Geezer, what are your thoughts on Sessions, since you artfully dodged any opinion on him?
Should he resign immediately as repentance for betraying the great and infallible Trump?
- Top
Comment
-
And Geezer, while you're typing, can you explain why the leader of your ideology, the man who is infallible, the great Trump, would give an interview to the failing New York Times to blast Jeff Sessions, on a day when the Repeal of the hated Obamacare, is falling apart?
Try to keep in mind that his really influential advisers, Cohn and Kushner especially, are life-long liberals. Trump was in favor of single-payer health care during the election. I will say that I was pleasantly surprised by the quality of the Gorsuch nomination, and I think conservatives should give Trump a chance.
- Top
Comment
-
For those unfamiliar, there is criminal asset forfeiture. If you're convicted of a crime, the government can take ill-gotten property. Civil asset forfeiture is taking property (mostly money) from a person suspected (but not necessarily charged) of a crime. The practice has emerged as a response to the "war on drugs" but has expanded and is now at the point where, perhaps, it's more "revenue generating" than anything else. It strikes me as blatantly unconstitutional -- you just can't take people's shit w/o the proper process and being suspected of a crime can't satisfy that.
A more recent story: I own a pretty fair sized parcel of land in Carmel, CA. Cali had no "absentee landowner" defense available, so, if pot were found on my land, the government could take the land under civil asset forfeiture when I was charged. There are scores of stories in Ca. of sheriff departments planting pot, then "arresting" an absentee owner for the purpose of ultimately taking the land. With legalized pot since Nov., it is harder to prosecute, and besides, it turns out that my land is one of the only parcels in Monterey County to be zoned for the type of horticulture that pot-growing is. The government giveth.....the government taketh......
- Top
Comment
-
The Clinton Foundation is the Shadow Government, CGVT. Get right with the TRUTH!
- Top
Comment
Comment