Talent,
Do you have much experience with establishment jurisprudence? If so, can you explain the principled difference between the state being required to allow churches the benefits of government, but being exempt from any "burden" of government?
Seems to me the wall between church and state is becoming a one way barrier and I don't see why that should be.
Obviously this is related to yesterday's Trinity Lutheran case.
Do you have much experience with establishment jurisprudence? If so, can you explain the principled difference between the state being required to allow churches the benefits of government, but being exempt from any "burden" of government?
Seems to me the wall between church and state is becoming a one way barrier and I don't see why that should be.
Obviously this is related to yesterday's Trinity Lutheran case.
Comment