Announcement

Collapse

Please support the Forum by using the Amazon Link this Holiday Season

Amazon has started their Black Friday sales and there are some great deals to be had! As you shop this holiday season, please consider using the forum's Amazon.com link (listed in the menu as "Amazon Link") to add items to your cart and purchase them. The forum gets a small commission from every item sold.

Additionally, the forum gets a "bounty" for various offers at Amazon.com. For instance, if you sign up for a 30 day free trial of Amazon Prime, the forum will earn $3. Same if you buy a Prime membership for someone else as a gift! Trying out or purchasing an Audible membership will earn the forum a few bucks. And creating an Amazon Business account will send a $15 commission our way.

If you have an Amazon Echo, you need a free trial of Amazon Music!! We will earn $3 and it's free to you!

Your personal information is completely private, I only get a list of items that were ordered/shipped via the link, no names or locations or anything. This does not cost you anything extra and it helps offset the operating costs of this forum, which include our hosting fees and the yearly registration and licensing fees.

Stay safe and well and thank you for your participation in the Forum and for your support!! --Deborah

Here is the link:
Click here to shop at Amazon.com
See more
See less

Miscellaneous And Off Topic Subjects

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • I've said this many times but this is why this is such a great forum. Thanks to talent, Stan and Geezer to credibly adding to the discussion.

    To me, once it's been explained in terms I can digest and understand, deciding on the legality of the Immigration EO is a simple matter...... and I don't want to imply that language and the concept of "between the four corners" is not vitally important to how the Courts rule on the matter before them.

    As a lay person, I'm in agreement with talent ..... the EO is bad but it should be allowed to stand. I also understand the subtleties in ruling based on the law versus the Scalia approach of originalism. I can see why Geezer isn't as Sanguine as talent is in predicting the outcome.

    Anyway, the interesting dialogue on the facts here, is a welcome relief from the theater coming from both sides, a lot of it just strikingly inaccurate and misleading ..... and that's what bothers me.

    The bigger picture is illuminated this way ......My gut tells me DJT - and that gut feeling is based on the crazy shit floating around out there about Trump since he took office - has no understanding of this particular EO and its implications to even the minimal depth of it that we've gotten to here.

    Seems he lacks both the intelligence and the patience to want to deliberate and consider matters. He just wants to act and any mess he makes by that action, he'll worry about that later.

    Like the entirety of the Bush crowd, to a lesser degree HW, those administrations aggravated the shit out of me by failing to understand that the people they are trying to persuade to their view of things are capable of weighing the information available, taking a position, and being comfortable with it.

    Instead, in a calculated way, because those administrations were not made up of stupid people - they dumbed everything down and frequently misrepresented facts in intentional ways so that that their audience would see their preferred course of action favorably.

    My concern is that the Trump administration isn't doing any of this in some well thought out way to achieve an end. DJT does not seem to me to be an intellectual or a thinker. None of the people around him have impressed me as particularly intellectual - save maybe SECDEF Mattis. So, you have this gaggle of actors making decisions, formulating policy and interacting with their international peers without regard to consequences and in ways that potentially put the US at risk.
    Mission to CFB's National Championship accomplished. But the shine on the NC Trophy is embarrassingly wearing off. It's M B-Ball ..... or hockey or volley ball or name your college sport favorite time ...... until next year.

    Comment


    • My gut tells me DJT - and that gut feeling is based on the crazy shit floating around out there about Trump since he took office - has no understanding of this particular EO and its implications to even the minimal depth of it that we've gotten to here.
      I firmly believe that the EO is intended as a symbolic gesture. I firmly believe folks in his administration thought they could do it in a way that wasn't a "muslim ban" on its face. I firmly believe DJT had zero clue or interest in the technicalities -- he wanted to sign something "banning terrorists" or something.

      I don't particularly enjoy this issue because I don't like the EO and I don't like the order striking it down.
      Dan Patrick: What was your reaction to [Urban Meyer being hired]?
      Brady Hoke: You know.....not....good.

      Comment


      • Trump will continue running into trouble again and again so long as he lets the 'politicos' around him (Bannon, Miller, Kelly, & Flynn to a lesser extent) have more power than the 'professionals' (Mattis, Tillerson, Kelly, etc.)

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Jeff Buchanan View Post

          Seems he lacks both the intelligence and the patience to want to deliberate and consider matters. He just wants to act and any mess he makes by that action, he'll worry about that later.
          This has been my concern since the day he won the GOP nomination, and really, before. The way he acts and speaks is considered by many to be blunt and forthright, but IMO is actually indicative of a person who has cruised through life without facing proportional consequences to decisions. As you state, he acts and others deal with the outcomes...exactly like we are seeing today.

          He is largely insulated, but that’s going to change; he hasn’t got a fraction of the control over the environment he’s running in now, compared to his days shouldering around the real estate world. IDK that he is even remotely equipped to handle it, intellectually, or emotionally. The evidence to date suggests a resounding "No".

          Comment


          • Originally posted by iam416 View Post
            I firmly believe that the EO is intended as a symbolic gesture. I firmly believe folks in his administration thought they could do it in a way that wasn't a "muslim ban" on its face. I firmly believe DJT had zero clue or interest in the technicalities -- he wanted to sign something "banning terrorists" or something.

            I don't particularly enjoy this issue because I don't like the EO and I don't like the order striking it down.
            I agree, Trump said he was going to do something about immigration and ban them from certain countries, so he threw some shit against the wall without any thought about the impact or execution. And not having any true governmental operatives in the mix helped add to the chaos.

            The thing is, if he had any sort of tact, he could make a decent, balanced argument (as others have) of why this was done. But he a such a hyperbolic blowhard that everything is "thousands of terrorists are streaming into our country", "EXTREME VETTING", just straight up fear-mongering.

            Comment


            • Well, if he'd ran this through some semblance of process with the involved agencies and counsel it would have taken longer, but he probably would have walked this into the end zone. Instead he's thrown a couple incomplete passes from the 2 yardline.

              #footballmetaphors

              Comment


              • Fuck no ..... he just threw an interception that is under official review.
                Mission to CFB's National Championship accomplished. But the shine on the NC Trophy is embarrassingly wearing off. It's M B-Ball ..... or hockey or volley ball or name your college sport favorite time ...... until next year.

                Comment


                • TARGETING

                  Comment


                  • Neil Gorsuch calls Trump's "so-called judge" comment disheartening and demoralizing

                    Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch told a US senator Wednesday that President Donald Trump’s tweets about the judiciary are “demoralizing” and “disheartening.”

                    Comment


                    • I am heartened and moralized.

                      Comment


                      • Good for you Neil.

                        Comment


                        • Crying Neil Goresuch is wrong! Not demoralizing or disheartening! This so-called nominee is dangerous! Sad!
                          "The problem with quotes on the Internet is that it is sometimes hard to verify their authenticity." -Abraham Lincoln

                          Comment


                          • Seems to me he's now an ``Trump-called nominee'', but let's let the lawyers intrepret for us.

                            Comment


                            • Lying hack is spreading fake news! Sad!
                              "The problem with quotes on the Internet is that it is sometimes hard to verify their authenticity." -Abraham Lincoln

                              Comment


                              • I think is is both arrogant and a form of virtue signaling to question Trump's intelligence.

                                Look at the scoreboard, both in his career in the private sector and in his brief public career.
                                Last edited by Da Geezer; February 9, 2017, 10:31 AM.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X