Announcement

Collapse

Please support the Forum by using the Amazon Link this Holiday Season

Amazon has started their Black Friday sales and there are some great deals to be had! As you shop this holiday season, please consider using the forum's Amazon.com link (listed in the menu as "Amazon Link") to add items to your cart and purchase them. The forum gets a small commission from every item sold.

Additionally, the forum gets a "bounty" for various offers at Amazon.com. For instance, if you sign up for a 30 day free trial of Amazon Prime, the forum will earn $3. Same if you buy a Prime membership for someone else as a gift! Trying out or purchasing an Audible membership will earn the forum a few bucks. And creating an Amazon Business account will send a $15 commission our way.

If you have an Amazon Echo, you need a free trial of Amazon Music!! We will earn $3 and it's free to you!

Your personal information is completely private, I only get a list of items that were ordered/shipped via the link, no names or locations or anything. This does not cost you anything extra and it helps offset the operating costs of this forum, which include our hosting fees and the yearly registration and licensing fees.

Stay safe and well and thank you for your participation in the Forum and for your support!! --Deborah

Here is the link:
Click here to shop at Amazon.com
See more
See less

Miscellaneous And Off Topic Subjects

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by SeattleLionsFan View Post
    Discretionary spending is just over 1T a year. Of that 600B is military spending.


    Presumably the number grows at the baseline to ultimately be a far larger number after another 10 years, at which point the cuts would also proportionally reduce spending. Also could have dune entitlement reform included.

    Ultimately, regardless of the size, the goal of reining in government spending is promising, and far from the stated "4 years smaller gov. conservatives will hate"
    Atlanta, GA

    Comment


    • Originally posted by whodean View Post
      Overall, the blueprint being used by Trump?s team would reduce federal spending by $10.5 trillion over 10 years.

      That is the very definition of smaller government
      I think you're being awfully literal here. "Smaller government" conservatives aren't just concerned with the phyiscal number of govt employees or the size of the budget; it's also the level of control the government has over all aspects of life.

      Trump promised today (and has been promising all along) a government that intervenes in the economy to, as he sees it, benefit Americans This almost certainly means erecting trade barriers where none currently exist. Also personal interventions by himself to pressure, cajole, or threaten individual companies into giving him what he wants. An effective tariff regime will require a regulatory staff, to monitor and make sure companies aren't cheating by slipping in illegal imports. So some agency is going to require more staff to effectively manage all that.

      I'm not opining on what's better for America right here. I'm just telling you that Trump's very interested in increasing regulation when it comes to certain aspects of the economy, absolutely trade and manufacturing.

      Comment


      • Photo comparison between the crowd to hear Obama in '09 and Trump today

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Dr. Strangelove View Post
          I think you're being awfully literal here. "Smaller government" conservatives aren't just concerned with the phyiscal number of govt employees or the size of the budget; it's also the level of control the government has over all aspects of life.

          I'm not opining on what's better for America right here. I'm just telling you that Trump's very interested in increasing regulation when it comes to certain aspects of the economy, absolutely trade and manufacturing.
          This is on point. "Smaller government" means less government interference in economic, monetary, educational policy etc. not just numbers.
          Monkeys don't sell bananas.

          Comment


          • Man there is nobody there watching this parade, even right next to where Trump is sitting. There were more people at the DC Memorial Day parade when I went years ago.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by whodean View Post
              Presumably the number grows at the baseline to ultimately be a far larger number after another 10 years, at which point the cuts would also proportionally reduce spending. Also could have dune entitlement reform included.

              Ultimately, regardless of the size, the goal of reining in government spending is promising, and far from the stated "4 years smaller gov. conservatives will hate"
              Cutting dual entitlement would be a mistake and show blatant disregard for the less than 1% of Americans who stood up and stepped forward when our nation called in them. Multiple years fighting an increasingly unpopular war against an enemy that is able to fade into the civilian populace the moment that you try to strike back takes a very large toll on the psyche. And not just on the individual Soldier, Sailor, Airman or Marine but on the services themselves and the leadership of these services.

              I've deployed 4 times to the ME. I have irreversible damage to both my knees and my lower back from years of wearing 70% of my body weight in gear. And that's just some of my physical ailments. I would take it very personally if, after 20 years (8 years from now) I was forced to choose between my promised retirement pay (50% of my base pay for the highest paying 36 months) or my disability pay. At this point I'm probably already looking at 60% disability, I struggle to stand for more than about an hour at a time, I can't handle crowds, have panic attacks at the right mixture of sound and smells, can't tolerate in the least people not being able to follow simple directions, or tardiness, have trouble being questioned when giving directions and snap at anyone being blatantly disrespectful. Does that sound like someone who will be able to easily be able to transition to the civilian workforce?

              No, not really. I've actually debated spending my post military career in politics. I feel that there are not enough veterans in it because after years of wading through bullshit most are just done, not wishing to step into even more bullshit. I think that the opposite is true though, civil service is a mandate to represent every person in your area and attempt to ensure that their voice is heard.

              Sent from my XT1060 using Tapatalk
              AAL- Sam Martin - Because the Punter is one of Detroit's most used assets

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Dr. Strangelove View Post
                Man there is nobody there watching this parade, even right next to where Trump is sitting. There were more people at the DC Memorial Day parade when I went years ago.
                Does this say more about the new president or more about the disillusionment with the American political system?
                Monkeys don't sell bananas.

                Comment


                • Miscellaneous And Off Topic Subjects

                  First, thank you for your service.

                  Muy auto correct changed "some entitlement reform" to "dune entitlement reform".

                  What is dual entitlement?

                  The entitlement return I favor is means testing, waste removal, gradually increasing retirement age, things that probably would not affect most middle age to older truly needing Americans
                  Last edited by whodean; January 20, 2017, 05:52 PM.
                  Atlanta, GA

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Wellington_beefhouser View Post
                    Does this say more about the new president or more about the disillusionment with the American political system?
                    Probably option 2. I think a lot voted for Trump more out of frustration than rapturous adulation of the man.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Dr. Strangelove View Post
                      Probably option 2. I think a lot voted for Trump more out of frustration than rapturous adulation of the man.
                      Agreed. The real kicker here is what happens when nothing changes? Seems to me Trump's cabinet selections signal same ol' DC politics. If nothing changes, nothing changes. The way the voting is shaking out time after time has me losing faith in the intelligence of the voters. Next president....Kanye West! Crazier and crazier.
                      Monkeys don't sell bananas.

                      Comment


                      • I've actually debated spending my post military career in politics. I feel that there are not enough veterans in it because after years of wading through bullshit most are just done, not wishing to step into even more bullshit. I think that the opposite is true though, civil service is a mandate to represent every person in your area and attempt to ensure that their voice is heard.

                        Do it!

                        Comment


                        • This is from right by the White House. Lot of wasted money on port-a-potties

                          [ame]https://twitter.com/SamSeder/status/822566396282466309[/ame]

                          Comment


                          • Here you go DLS feel better!


                            [ame="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q2R2btO4MEo"]Liberal Protester screams in agony as Trump sworn in - YouTube[/ame]

                            Comment


                            • The crowds today will be nothing in comparison to when Trump has his military parades in May, they will have to order twice as many Don Johns.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by whodean View Post
                                First, thank you for your service.

                                Muy auto correct changed "some entitlement reform" to "dune entitlement reform".

                                What is dual entitlement?

                                The entitlement return I favor is means testing, waste removal, gradually increasing retirement age, things that probably would not affect most middle age to older truly needing Americans
                                Dual entitlement is receiving both your military retirement and a VA disability check. Sorry that I misunderstood your post, but the idea of cutting dual entitlement has been floated in the Senate the last few years as a cost cutting measure.

                                I fully agree that the military budget is far too bloated, but vehemently disagree that cutting troop pay and/entitlements is the way to go about it. The is plenty of pork to cut, from rediculous contacts to civilian defense companies to over the top future weapon programs that never amount to anything to the multibillion spent on making unnecessary incremental improvements to technology that is the best in the world as is.

                                Sent from my XT1060 using Tapatalk
                                AAL- Sam Martin - Because the Punter is one of Detroit's most used assets

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X