If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
If you are having difficulty logging in, please REFRESH the page and clear your browser cache and try again.
If you still can't get logged in, please try using Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome, Firefox, Opera, or Safari to login. Also be sure you are using the latest version of your browser. Internet Explorer has not been updated in over seven years and will no longer work with the Forum software. Thanks
On Saturday Sherone Moore was appointed as THE Offensive Coordinator. No more sharing the title with anyone. He will also continue as OL coach. I'd like to think this lets Michigan keep him a bit longer before someone realizes what the guy does, and steals him away.
As expected, Chris Partridge will now become the LB coach, after Helow departed. At least this isn't a step backward. Partridge has put a few guys in The League, and will likely do so again. And Partridge is an excellent recruiter out east.
Unless something unexpected pops up, the coaching staff should be set for 2023.
"The stockings were hung by the chimney with care, .. I'd worn them for weeks, and they needed the air"
Rule changes to shorten the college game could be on the way for 2023. The most impactful proposals are no longer stopping the clock after first down plays and not stopping the clock after incomplete passes. The latter probably has little to no chance of passing but the fact it's even on the table is alarming.
While some adjustments may be controversial, others are seen as easy items to pass
College executives have been told the average offense would lose about seven plays per game if the clock was allowed to run after first downs. That's less impactful than letting the clock run after incomplete passes, which projects to remove 18-20 plays from each contest, fundamentally changing the game's structure. Especially in a sport where a record 46% of snaps were passing plays in 2022.
The first down timing I have no issue with. The not stopping after incompletions is a bad idea and has zero chance of passing. I'm not even sure the first down change will pass but zero chance of the latter.
I found the NCAA's logic humorous. They say they need to decrease plays in order to create the appearance that they are limiting players' exposure to serious injury so the blood-thirsty lawyers won't sue them into oblivion. The implied position is: Football is bad for you. To save you from yourself we will limit how much football you are "exposed" to. The fewer snaps played, the better. So zero football snaps really seems like the optimal outcome.
I found the NCAA's logic humorous. They say they need to decrease plays in order to create the appearance that they are limiting players' exposure to serious injury so the blood-thirsty lawyers won't sue them into oblivion. The implied position is: Football is bad for you. To save you from yourself we will limit how much football you are "exposed" to. The fewer snaps played, the better. So zero football snaps really seems like the optimal outcome.
Well, there's no consequence to them in advancing obvious bullshit, so...
I've always wondered why the clock couldn't start again after an incomplete pass, as long as the ball has been spotted. Stopping the clock is from the olden days when teams played with one ball, and the ball had to be chased down after each play. Nowadays, each team has like 8 balls they've checked in, and 2-3 ball boys to go shag the balls down. I'd have no problem with the clock restarting after an incomplete pass, as long as the ball has been spotted and ready for play.
Wiz mentioned another problem, and that is with replay. We saw it many times this past season. There needs to be a time limit on replays. If the mistake isn't obvious enough to be corrected after one minute, then the play should stand as called on the field. Nit-picking a call for several minutes is not what replay was intended for. Fix obvious errors, and move on.
But the real problem why games are taking so long, is TELEVISION. The ridiculous number of TV time outs after change of posessions, etc., is absolutely ridiculous. The TIME taken during these time outs is ridiculous too. Some of them take upwards of 4-5 minutes. That's the real problem, but as Wiz said, that's never going to change because that's where the money is.
As far as the clock running after first downs, I don't see that as a biggie. They do that now in the NFL and it doesn't seem to hurt their game. If need be, give teams one additional time out, that can be carried over to the 2nd half. They have six (6) now, one additional wouldn't be that big of a deal, as long as the networks didn't stretch it to 5 minutes.
"The stockings were hung by the chimney with care, .. I'd worn them for weeks, and they needed the air"
Lining up all of the "Full Media Time-Out" redcoats and making them all walk the plank in shark-infested waters would be the best way to speed up games- and would be quite amusing to see.
Comment