M can do OSU style man-ball ..... not as well but it can do that.......with a reboot and getting rid of Brown isn't going to do that.
It was fairly obvious that Clemson's D was flat out getting whipped at the LOS. Some of that is talent but most of it is great coaching and great play calling. OSU's play calling involves working plays that Fields is good at not making Fields do things he doesn't do as well. That is CRD's strong suit. OSU has some exploitable weaknesses on D involving the back end but, guess what, OSU adapted to that as far as I could tell. After CLemson's first drive and a few Taylor Lawrence flashes of greatness, nada.
Michigan under Harbaugh has been the counterpoint to how OSU runs it's football program. Both the M O and the D have been hamstrung by what appears based on what goes on in a game as bad coaching and more importantly forcing systems on players who may or may not be good at playing that way. That gives rise to player discontent, resistance and downward spiraling performance.
It was fairly obvious that Clemson's D was flat out getting whipped at the LOS. Some of that is talent but most of it is great coaching and great play calling. OSU's play calling involves working plays that Fields is good at not making Fields do things he doesn't do as well. That is CRD's strong suit. OSU has some exploitable weaknesses on D involving the back end but, guess what, OSU adapted to that as far as I could tell. After CLemson's first drive and a few Taylor Lawrence flashes of greatness, nada.
Michigan under Harbaugh has been the counterpoint to how OSU runs it's football program. Both the M O and the D have been hamstrung by what appears based on what goes on in a game as bad coaching and more importantly forcing systems on players who may or may not be good at playing that way. That gives rise to player discontent, resistance and downward spiraling performance.
Comment