The enthusiasm for and the quality of M football has sunken to new lows.
If you look at program enthusiasm/quality graphically, when LC retired and RichRod showed up, a steep rise in enthusiasm for the program ensued followed by a gradual then steep decline below baseline. Hoke arrives along with new hope that the RR debacle was over. Program enthusiasm rises but not as high as what the Rodriguez hiring generated. The Hoke era had a more subdued decline in program enthusiasm - he was a genuinely nice guy. Al Borges hurt the program though and soon program enthusiasm rapidly declined below baseline but not for long as a Harbaugh hire was on the horizon with signs "it's happening" while Hoke was still on the sidelines. The arrival of Jim Hackett as AD was the cause of that.
At last, the program's savior had arrived. Enthusiasm skyrocketed when Harbaugh was hired rising to unprecedented peaks. Quality, however lagged. By year 3 as the quality of the football Harbaugh was delivering declined, enthusiasm became blunted and by year 6 and the MSU loss both the assessment of the quality of JH's work and program enthusiasm was plummeting. It is now belwo the pre-Don Canham, Bump Elliot era.
So, yeah, to answer your question, no M is not running the football well or doing anything at all well. Thanks for asking.
If you look at program enthusiasm/quality graphically, when LC retired and RichRod showed up, a steep rise in enthusiasm for the program ensued followed by a gradual then steep decline below baseline. Hoke arrives along with new hope that the RR debacle was over. Program enthusiasm rises but not as high as what the Rodriguez hiring generated. The Hoke era had a more subdued decline in program enthusiasm - he was a genuinely nice guy. Al Borges hurt the program though and soon program enthusiasm rapidly declined below baseline but not for long as a Harbaugh hire was on the horizon with signs "it's happening" while Hoke was still on the sidelines. The arrival of Jim Hackett as AD was the cause of that.
At last, the program's savior had arrived. Enthusiasm skyrocketed when Harbaugh was hired rising to unprecedented peaks. Quality, however lagged. By year 3 as the quality of the football Harbaugh was delivering declined, enthusiasm became blunted and by year 6 and the MSU loss both the assessment of the quality of JH's work and program enthusiasm was plummeting. It is now belwo the pre-Don Canham, Bump Elliot era.
So, yeah, to answer your question, no M is not running the football well or doing anything at all well. Thanks for asking.
Comment