The link below is a very good mgo analysis of "Unit Cohesion." What does this mean? The article looks at how in-play adjustments are made (or not) by the defense as a play unfolds. If you move to the comments section (a tedious process to avoid so, I'll note what's important within it), you'll see that observers did not think the interior DL was getting beat up by osu's OL like the meme on this would have us believe. Instead, it was a matter of excellent run-play calling and excellent OL execution (holding blocks) by osu. IOW, great coaching ..... the talent gap is over played at least in this instance.
It's the start of the 3rd quarter, osu has the ball with a 12 point lead at 28-16. M needs a stop and a quick score to close the gap. What happens on 1st and 10 is a 40+ yard run by dobbins to the M 33. osu then scores to go up 35-16.... game over.
What happened (Cliff Notes):
M is in a 4-2-5 (subject to formation naming confusion!). fields is under C, dobbins is behind him 7y deep.
The D anticipates correctly and is set for a zone run. On this kind of defensive play, Brown's approach is to "spill" the runner into numbers. This isn't a play. It is an in-play adjustment the defense has to execute. M has numbers and should stop this play for minimal gain if it executes the spill.
Instead, the author (Seth) thinks that an inexperienced MLB, Cam McGrone, mis-reads Hudson's push, goes to help inside instead of setting an edge and, as planned, dobbins, who is locked on to read McGrone's move, cut's outside the undefended edge to open grass. Classic mistake by McGrone in what looks to be in Seth's mind an aggressive risk McGrone knows he's taking to make a big play.
Aggression ....... and Seth thinks this may be a fundamental issue with the way M's defense is coached. Instead of discipline - what was required to keep this from being a big play - we have aggression that gets exploited (and Seth does give credit to day's play calling here as it is probably an RPS win - see the whole article for details). There's a ton of very detailed analysis in this mgo piece if you want to see it. Intricate and interesting if you have time. If you do anything just click the link and watch the MP4 Video (that I can't embed here). You'll get the picture.
The reason I posted this here is that if Brown's aggressive approach to defense - like we see Cam McGrone being aggressive in an attempt to make a big play - is an underlying problem that opposing OCs are going to exploit, and I think it is because it is identifiable trend with Brown, this kind of thing isn't a talent issue, it's a coaching issue ....... and I am damn sure both Harbaugh and Brown know it is.
This isn't a fire Brown hawt-take. It's an attempt to highlight a fixable downside to what Brown seems to be all about. The downside goes away against non-elite teams with just good RBs. Against osu, a team with dobbins and what appears to be a coaching staff that can depantz (RPS) an opponent, esp. Michigan, by setting up and then exploiting identifiable trends, it becomes clear why M is 0-5 v. osu under Harbaugh.
You can bet that Alabama will try to do the same thing in their run game with Harris. Worth looking at to see whether or not Brown has addressed this, his defense is better v. Harris than it was v. dobbins and the Tide doesn't roll up 300 yards rushing
It's the start of the 3rd quarter, osu has the ball with a 12 point lead at 28-16. M needs a stop and a quick score to close the gap. What happens on 1st and 10 is a 40+ yard run by dobbins to the M 33. osu then scores to go up 35-16.... game over.
What happened (Cliff Notes):
M is in a 4-2-5 (subject to formation naming confusion!). fields is under C, dobbins is behind him 7y deep.
The D anticipates correctly and is set for a zone run. On this kind of defensive play, Brown's approach is to "spill" the runner into numbers. This isn't a play. It is an in-play adjustment the defense has to execute. M has numbers and should stop this play for minimal gain if it executes the spill.
Instead, the author (Seth) thinks that an inexperienced MLB, Cam McGrone, mis-reads Hudson's push, goes to help inside instead of setting an edge and, as planned, dobbins, who is locked on to read McGrone's move, cut's outside the undefended edge to open grass. Classic mistake by McGrone in what looks to be in Seth's mind an aggressive risk McGrone knows he's taking to make a big play.
Aggression ....... and Seth thinks this may be a fundamental issue with the way M's defense is coached. Instead of discipline - what was required to keep this from being a big play - we have aggression that gets exploited (and Seth does give credit to day's play calling here as it is probably an RPS win - see the whole article for details). There's a ton of very detailed analysis in this mgo piece if you want to see it. Intricate and interesting if you have time. If you do anything just click the link and watch the MP4 Video (that I can't embed here). You'll get the picture.
The reason I posted this here is that if Brown's aggressive approach to defense - like we see Cam McGrone being aggressive in an attempt to make a big play - is an underlying problem that opposing OCs are going to exploit, and I think it is because it is identifiable trend with Brown, this kind of thing isn't a talent issue, it's a coaching issue ....... and I am damn sure both Harbaugh and Brown know it is.
This isn't a fire Brown hawt-take. It's an attempt to highlight a fixable downside to what Brown seems to be all about. The downside goes away against non-elite teams with just good RBs. Against osu, a team with dobbins and what appears to be a coaching staff that can depantz (RPS) an opponent, esp. Michigan, by setting up and then exploiting identifiable trends, it becomes clear why M is 0-5 v. osu under Harbaugh.
You can bet that Alabama will try to do the same thing in their run game with Harris. Worth looking at to see whether or not Brown has addressed this, his defense is better v. Harris than it was v. dobbins and the Tide doesn't roll up 300 yards rushing
Comment