If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
If you are having difficulty logging in, please REFRESH the page and clear your browser cache and try again.
If you still can't get logged in, please try using Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome, Firefox, Opera, or Safari to login. Also be sure you are using the latest version of your browser. Internet Explorer has not been updated in over seven years and will no longer work with the Forum software. Thanks
"...when Hibernian won the Scottish Cup final and that celebration, Sunshine on Leith? I don’t think there’s a better football celebration ever in the game.”
If Indy doesn't make a play for Stafford they'll be damn fools. They have everything except a QB.
F#*K OHIO!!!
You're not only an amazingly beautiful man, but you're the greatest football mind to ever exist. <-- Jeffy Shittypants actually posted this. I knew he was in love with me.
I would give Stafford and the next 3 years of first rounders for Lawrence
F#*K OHIO!!!
You're not only an amazingly beautiful man, but you're the greatest football mind to ever exist. <-- Jeffy Shittypants actually posted this. I knew he was in love with me.
The three firsts is the kind of move you make when you have the luxury of a good team that just needs a QB. Otherwise you are just crippling your overall talent level and the guy you grabbed will fail.
Just because QB is the most important individual position doesn't mean you can win with a great one and a bad team.
Far more likely to win a superbowk with a great team and a bad QB than with a Great QB on a bad team.
I think that's obvious Indy is the best fit and I think all these articles are just talking out of their asses stating it. Who will give the best deal though?
Tweet
Comment