Originally posted by froot loops
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Matt Stafford is the suckiest suck to ever suck
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Mainevent View PostWait, so Stafford should throw more TDs because the team can never run the ball?
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mainevent View PostWait, so Stafford should throw more TDs because the team can never run the ball?
If you can run the ball, you'd expect your QB to have less - i.e. Cleveland - 20 rushing TD's from non-QB's.
- Top
Comment
-
If you can’t run the ball, teams are sitting on the pass dropping 8 into coverage. If you can’t run the ball, play action won’t work. If you can’t run the ball, every short yardage play becomes an adventure making it difficult to stay on the field. If you can’t run the ball, that generally means your OL is not very good.
- Top
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by chemiclord View Post
And it only really happens in basketball when your name is LeBron James and you've shown you have a better idea how to build a team around you than half of the GMs you've ever worked with.
This was just idiotic speculation about Stafford not doing what QB's with superbowl wins don't get to do.
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mainevent View PostIf you can’t run the ball, teams are sitting on the pass dropping 8 into coverage. If you can’t run the ball, play action won’t work. If you can’t run the ball, every short yardage play becomes an adventure making it difficult to stay on the field. If you can’t run the ball, that generally means your OL is not very good.
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mainevent View PostIf you can’t run the ball, teams are sitting on the pass dropping 8 into coverage. If you can’t run the ball, play action won’t work. If you can’t run the ball, every short yardage play becomes an adventure making it difficult to stay on the field. If you can’t run the ball, that generally means your OL is not very good.
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by JGSpartan View Post
And we just saw what happened in Houston. Knowing what we know of WCF if Stafford pulls a Watson and demands say and doesn't get it he'd just get to be disgruntled on the roster and not be traded like Watson is.
This was just idiotic speculation about Stafford not doing what QB's with superbowl wins don't get to do.
I don't get why people think that pure desire from a quarterback is going to force a franchise to make a team better. Michael Jordan was one of the greatest competitors of all time, but you don't want him making personnel decisions. It's lazy thinking, if anything Stafford's biggest problem was he was a crutch for 12 seasons, he made it appear to the team that they were better than they were. As we saw in the Patricia era, when he was out the team was the worst team in the league.
- Top
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Right. I don't even think he's Top end elite. Second tier Franchise QB absolutely though. Its a lot like the purgatory the Pistons have been in being just outside playoffs or one of the last teams in. Then not getting top picks most years to add desperately needed talent to a weak roster outside of 1 or two good players.
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Ken View PostEnd of an Era,
At least we know why Decker was worried about Stafford.
This will be the best outcome for both parties.
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by 313LionsFan View Post
I stated that in the pass. It was best for both parties to separate!!! We should be commending the Lions on the hiring on Anthony Lynn. He did wonders with Justin Herbert and will do the same for our next franchise QB...deal with it
- Top
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mainevent View PostIf you can’t run the ball, teams are sitting on the pass dropping 8 into coverage. If you can’t run the ball, play action won’t work. If you can’t run the ball, every short yardage play becomes an adventure making it difficult to stay on the field. If you can’t run the ball, that generally means your OL is not very good.
39 TD's, even though he had the worst O-line in the league (51 sacks and no running game - even worse than the Lions that year).
More opportunities to throw, you'd expect a QB to throw more TD's - and the great ones usually do.
I'm not the one who used the word great in regards to Stafford - it's why I take exception.
- Top
- Likes 1
Comment
-
You’re right, he’s not as good as a guy with a claim to being the best QB of all time was in his prime.
oh, by the way that GB team was 20th in rushing, and 11th overall in defense. So you know, not historically inept like the Lions tend to be most years.
- Top
Comment
Comment