If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
If you are having difficulty logging in, please REFRESH the page and clear your browser cache and try again.
If you still can't get logged in, please try using Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome, Firefox, Opera, or Safari to login. Also be sure you are using the latest version of your browser. Internet Explorer has not been updated in over seven years and will no longer work with the Forum software. Thanks
The post isn't really confusing. Just requires context.
Someone made uncompromising and bold proclamations that were almost immediately turned on their head. DPAT was ceding those points with /s followed by fail-safe parentheticals to indicate true outcome events (this could be viewed as taunting, but the original proposition comes from poster who often endorses alternate facts and would have no problem progressing through threads as though he were still true or if people believed him to be)
I made predictions that turned out to be inaccurate - oh the fucking horrors.
But late breaking news......Mediocre Matty is 4-55 and still wondering what's on the other side of the 35 yard line.
Haha I was waiting for one of you morons to link this.
What apparently undoes Stafford in that pff 'breakdown' is "turnover worthy throws" which apparently means throws that should have been intercepted but were not. So a completely subjective stat.
Also JIMMY GARAPPOLO IS SO GOOD WOW WITH HIS 7 CAREER STARTS
and
Where is Dak? I thought he was the second coming? Oh. His running game went to shit and he predictably did terribly.
1. Todd Gurley RB 2. Eddie Goldman DT 3. Tre McBride WR 5-7 OL Depth
Stanford ranks higher in all phases of the field and relatively close in everything else.
Greatest disparity in "turnover worthiness throw %"
Such strong evidence, please provide some insight in what the fuck that stat is cause
A. I have zero idea what that stat is
B. Why it is weighted in a way that is seems to trump most other stats
C. I doubt it's importance is great enough that if I did know, I'd hang a big enough hat that I could chastise other people by taking refuge in its significance
Comment