Matt Stafford is the suckiest suck to ever suck

[dpatnod]

Mediocre post.

Just up the beer count. Itll be fine.

[dwt1]

Then it's everything you're looking for.

[Fraquar]

That's actually a good question to ask. If we're talking about prime Rodgers vs prime Stafford, the answer is "hahahahahahahahahah lol no." But if we're to compare the two as they are right now? That answer is a definitive, "ya know... maybe?"

The answer is still "hahahahahahahahahah lol no." Nothing has changed.

What would even make people think "maybe?".

[chemiclord]

Because Rodgers wasn't quite as good this last year as he was in the past. Up until Stafford's injury, the two of them were virtually identical in every statistical metric.

Assuming Rodgers continues a slight downturn (he's at that age where most QBs start to tail off, by the by) and Stafford continues to rise... it's not a gimme that Rodgers will remain the superior QB comparing the two head-to-head.

[Panoptes]

Uh, IIRC, Rodgers led an alleged horrible roster to the NFC Championship game and nearly pulled off a miracle. Yeah, he really had a down year.

Heck, he even beat Stafford in his own house to take the division flag.

The one stat that Rodgers is good at year after year is, beating winning teams.

Yeah, Staffords right on his tail in accomplishments lore.

[chemiclord]

Which tells me the Green Bay Packers are the better team... which they are.

No matter how much you and DWT don't want to believe it, more than the QB matters.

[edindetroit]

Heck, he even beat Stafford in his own house to take the division flag.

He beat an injured Stafford.

[Panoptes]

Excuse making.

RODGERS was playing on one leg himself.

[FVD]

[LionsFanInJapan]

@moistpanties

That's great.

[Marko69]

New reason why Matt Stafford is the suckiest suck to ever suck ----> the beard with no 'tache look.

We don't want to see you rocking this look while you look downfield for an open receiver.

[dwt1]

Which tells me the Green Bay Packers are the better team... which they are.

They are a better team......they have a much better QB - which gives them a huge leg up on being a better team.

No matter how much you and DWT don't want to believe it, more than the QB matters.

So if you put Joey fucking Harrington as the starting QB in Green Bay, they still beat Detroit?

[dwt1]

Because Rodgers wasn't quite as good this last year as he was in the past. Up until Stafford's injury, the two of them were virtually identical in every statistical metric.

well....except for wins against winning teams

Assuming Rodgers continues a slight downturn (he's at that age where most QBs start to tail off, by the by) and Stafford continues to rise... it's not a gimme that Rodgers will remain the superior QB comparing the two head-to-head.

continues to rise? Seriously......Stafford peaked six years ago. Check it out.......it's a fact.

[edindetroit]

http://www.detroitlions.com/media-ce...d-640390487cc7

[dpatnod]

Yeah..... wtf do NFL players know? Amiright?