You're wrong. Ever heard of the Sloan Conference? Guys like Morey from Houston were all over the fact that a 3 is more efficient than a long range 2. This is pretty common knowledge for an NBA fan. Analytics is all the rage in the NBA right now. They even track how many miles each guy runs each game.
Announcement
Collapse
Please support the Forum by using the Amazon Link this Holiday Season
Amazon has started their Black Friday sales and there are some great deals to be had! As you shop this holiday season, please consider using the forum's Amazon.com link (listed in the menu as "Amazon Link") to add items to your cart and purchase them. The forum gets a small commission from every item sold.
Additionally, the forum gets a "bounty" for various offers at Amazon.com. For instance, if you sign up for a 30 day free trial of Amazon Prime, the forum will earn $3. Same if you buy a Prime membership for someone else as a gift! Trying out or purchasing an Audible membership will earn the forum a few bucks. And creating an Amazon Business account will send a $15 commission our way.
If you have an Amazon Echo, you need a free trial of Amazon Music!! We will earn $3 and it's free to you!
Your personal information is completely private, I only get a list of items that were ordered/shipped via the link, no names or locations or anything. This does not cost you anything extra and it helps offset the operating costs of this forum, which include our hosting fees and the yearly registration and licensing fees.
Stay safe and well and thank you for your participation in the Forum and for your support!! --Deborah
Here is the link:
Click here to shop at Amazon.com
Additionally, the forum gets a "bounty" for various offers at Amazon.com. For instance, if you sign up for a 30 day free trial of Amazon Prime, the forum will earn $3. Same if you buy a Prime membership for someone else as a gift! Trying out or purchasing an Audible membership will earn the forum a few bucks. And creating an Amazon Business account will send a $15 commission our way.
If you have an Amazon Echo, you need a free trial of Amazon Music!! We will earn $3 and it's free to you!
Your personal information is completely private, I only get a list of items that were ordered/shipped via the link, no names or locations or anything. This does not cost you anything extra and it helps offset the operating costs of this forum, which include our hosting fees and the yearly registration and licensing fees.
Stay safe and well and thank you for your participation in the Forum and for your support!! --Deborah
Here is the link:
Click here to shop at Amazon.com
See more
See less
Official Detroit Pistons thread
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by froot loops View PostIt took a long time for people to catch up to Rick Pitino and his philosophy from Providence. His simple formula was 33 percent for the arc = 50 percent for 2 point field goals.
The point is, Golden State didn't sit down with a calculator and say, "let's be a three point shooting team because the numbers add up" They got a couple of guys that shoot the shit out of the ball and said, "keep shooting it, guys. It works"I feel like I am watching the destruction of our democracy while my neighbors and friends cheer it on
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by CGVT View PostCall it analytics if you want, but common knowledge is pretty much common sense. It's like saying that shooting 80% from the free throw line is better than shooting 50% and calling it analytics.
The point is, Golden State didn't sit down with a calculator and say, "let's be a three point shooting team because the numbers add up" They got a couple of guys that shoot the shit out of the ball and said, "keep shooting it, guys. It works"
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by froot loops View PostIt took a long time for people to catch up to Rick Pitino and his philosophy from Providence. His simple formula was 33 percent for the arc = 50 percent for 2 point field goals.
Teams scored far more efficiently back in 1987 when teams only attempted 4 threes per game and shot 30%
Here's some basketball 101: you have more ways to score rather than just "one two point shot" and "one three point shot."
Free throws are a more efficient shot than three pointers. A second two point shot created by an offensive rebound creates a better opportunity to score than a single three point attempt.
Guess which facets of the game were at all time lows this season? Offensive rebounds and free throw attempts.
The shooting is better than it's ever been, but the game is punishing the teams that abuse it. The Warriors get a free pass because they're historically great.
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by CGVT View PostCall it analytics if you want, but common knowledge is pretty much common sense. It's like saying that shooting 80% from the free throw line is better than shooting 50% and calling it analytics.
The point is, Golden State didn't sit down with a calculator and say, "let's be a three point shooting team because the numbers add up" They got a couple of guys that shoot the shit out of the ball and said, "keep shooting it, guys. It works"
I guess I don't understand the rage at the guys with the calculators, Golden State runs their whole organization based on analytics. It's a tool, it is not an end all to team building. If it was the Rockets would be a lot more successful.
And your post indicates that that there was some sort of grand plan. The Warriors were fired Mark Jackson seasons ago.
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by froot loops View PostToo bad, you're missing out.
Not unless one of the top teams is chucking it up. I watch the Pistons (at times, after I know they had won), the conference finals and the finals. But I'm a defensive guy. I like to see a team get locked down and frustrated. I also like to see a team rise above great D and do their thing. The NBA has made it so difficult to play D that I am surprised they even try. It also skews your metrics because the rules are so different. The original splash brothers - Ray Allen (young) and Rashard Lewis would be right there with these wooses and probably winning it all.
As a matter of fact, the 01-02 team also had Vin Baker and Brent Barry and more but only managed 47 wins.
Today's NBA is not my palette. The only time I would feel like I missed out is if the Pistons made it deep and I didn't watch.Trickalicious - I don't think it is fair that the division rivals get to play the Lions twice. The Lions NEVER get to play the Lions, let alone twice.
- Top
Comment
-
Ya, I don't like it either. It's become college ball where everyone just chucks from three. I still watch because I love hoops, but I don't like the current state of the game at all. Give me defense and high percentage buckets over this chucking nonsense. I find the game today to be really boring.
- Top
Comment
-
The basketball of the past played one of two ways:
1) You had a high volume scoring guard, and you let him run iso plays all game.
2) You had a dominant big man, and you let him use his ass for a battering ram and little bunny hooks all game.
Either way, the game devolved into a glorified game of one-on-one. THAT shit was boring; not the ball movement and dribble penetration schemes being used now. Everyone needs to be able to shoot and move (with or without the ball) now, whether you're a point guard or a center. The overall skill level has only gone up, and that's a GOOD thing. Allen and Lewis would get CLOWNED by the length and speed of players today (at least the younger version of Allen without the savvy he developed later in his career). They'd get embarrassed off the court.
Defenses will eventually adapt, like they always do.Last edited by chemiclord; June 10, 2016, 05:47 PM.
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by froot loops View PostI do miss having a guy like Shaq down low, I just loved watching him play, but he was a generational type athlete he would have been so fun to watch in this era. So much free space.
He had no range, couldn't move with the ball, and while his passing did improve over the course of his career, it was about the only skill he actually developed. Defensively, his entire skill set was just to be bigger than everyone else.
I found that incredibly boring to watch. "Oh, look... Shaq ran someone over and dunked again. He only needs to do that twenty-five more times today. Yawn."
- Top
Comment
Comment