Originally posted by fontes91
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
Please support the Forum by using the Amazon Link this Holiday Season
Amazon has started their Black Friday sales and there are some great deals to be had! As you shop this holiday season, please consider using the forum's Amazon.com link (listed in the menu as "Amazon Link") to add items to your cart and purchase them. The forum gets a small commission from every item sold.
Additionally, the forum gets a "bounty" for various offers at Amazon.com. For instance, if you sign up for a 30 day free trial of Amazon Prime, the forum will earn $3. Same if you buy a Prime membership for someone else as a gift! Trying out or purchasing an Audible membership will earn the forum a few bucks. And creating an Amazon Business account will send a $15 commission our way.
If you have an Amazon Echo, you need a free trial of Amazon Music!! We will earn $3 and it's free to you!
Your personal information is completely private, I only get a list of items that were ordered/shipped via the link, no names or locations or anything. This does not cost you anything extra and it helps offset the operating costs of this forum, which include our hosting fees and the yearly registration and licensing fees.
Stay safe and well and thank you for your participation in the Forum and for your support!! --Deborah
Here is the link:
Click here to shop at Amazon.com
Additionally, the forum gets a "bounty" for various offers at Amazon.com. For instance, if you sign up for a 30 day free trial of Amazon Prime, the forum will earn $3. Same if you buy a Prime membership for someone else as a gift! Trying out or purchasing an Audible membership will earn the forum a few bucks. And creating an Amazon Business account will send a $15 commission our way.
If you have an Amazon Echo, you need a free trial of Amazon Music!! We will earn $3 and it's free to you!
Your personal information is completely private, I only get a list of items that were ordered/shipped via the link, no names or locations or anything. This does not cost you anything extra and it helps offset the operating costs of this forum, which include our hosting fees and the yearly registration and licensing fees.
Stay safe and well and thank you for your participation in the Forum and for your support!! --Deborah
Here is the link:
Click here to shop at Amazon.com
See more
See less
Official Detroit Pistons thread
Collapse
X
-
Unstoppable...sorta. Wilt in his twilight was still able to block Kareem's sky hook. Kareem played in a sweet spot where he was literally the only all-time great playing his position until moses Malone started to break out in the early 80's, which is also when kareem stopped winning MVPs. Who were his top rivals during the 70's? Lanier? Cowens? Please.
The one exception was when Bill Walton managed to keep himself healthy for about one calender year, but for that one year he spanked Kareem pretty hard.Last edited by Kstat; July 24, 2015, 10:39 PM.
- Top
Comment
-
Compared to what era? Now? I disagree. Thurmond, Walton, Wilt, Unseld, Gilmore, Reed, Lanier, Cowens. And I know I'm forgetting some.
Just looked it up - he averaged 21+ points per game every year through the age of 38. At 38 he averaged 23.4. Yeah, pretty much meh.Last edited by fontes91; July 25, 2015, 12:04 AM.
- Top
Comment
-
Thurmond fell off in the early 70's. Wilt and Reed were both gone by the early 70's. Unseld tore his knee up around that time and was never the same.
Walton would have been an excellent argument if he hadn't been made out of glass. I mentioned him already.
From 1973 to probably 1980, kareem really had no one to challenge him. Lanier and Cowens were both really good centers, just not good enough to be in Kareem's class.
And yes, I'm well aware Kareem was a top-5 center and top-10 player overall. That's my point. To him Cowens and Lanier weren't good enough to seriously challenge him. Walton was, but he couldn't stay healthy.
The 1960's had a lot of elite centers. So did the 1980's and the 1990's. The 1970's was pretty much Kareem terrorizing a league that was lacking in the talent department because of the ABA (and crack, but mostly the ABA).Last edited by Kstat; July 25, 2015, 12:28 AM.
- Top
Comment
-
In reading your posts what I see is both stating Kareem was great, but also diminishing his achievement due to lack of competition. I agree there were stronger eras for centers but that's not his fault. It's not to say he wouldn't have dominated greater talent had it been around. He averaged 23.4 points per game at age 38. At age 37 he averaged 22 and 8 and was Finals MVP. That was in 1985.
- Top
Comment
-
Yeah, his competition was diminished during the prime of his career. You think he would have won 6 MVPs if Julius Erving wasn't playing for the Virginia Squires in his prime? Or Rick Barry, one of the top 5 small forwards ever? The ABA sapped a big chunk of the top-shelf talent from the NBA for the better part of the decade, and nose candy sapped another chunk at the tail end.
And yes, he remained relatively effective through most of the 80's, but he wasn't the only game in town anymore. His rebounding fell off dramatically and his shot blocking followed suit soon after. His offense maintained because he had Magic and a number of all-stars around him to set him up and occupy the defense. He could shoot the sky hook at 27, 37, 47 or 57. All he needed was teammates to space the floor and someone to get him the ball. The rest of his game left him much earlier.Last edited by Kstat; July 25, 2015, 03:05 AM.
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kstat View PostThurmond fell off in the early 70's. Wilt and Reed were both gone by the early 70's. Unseld tore his knee up around that time and was never the same.
Walton would have been an excellent argument if he hadn't been made out of glass. I mentioned him already.
From 1973 to probably 1980, kareem really had no one to challenge him. Lanier and Cowens were both really good centers, just not good enough to be in Kareem's class.
And yes, I'm well aware Kareem was a top-5 center and top-10 player overall. That's my point. To him Cowens and Lanier weren't good enough to seriously challenge him. Walton was, but he couldn't stay healthy.
The 1960's had a lot of elite centers. So did the 1980's and the 1990's. The 1970's was pretty much Kareem terrorizing a league that was lacking in the talent department because of the ABA (and crack, but mostly the ABA).
In his prime Kareem was un guardable by anyone not named Chaimberlain. In fact, Kareem infuriated Wilt because he TOOK the mantle from him. He hated Kareem with a passion and I remember those two going at it really good with Kareem winning most.
You can't diminish a man's worth because noone else can better him. That's a foolish arguement.
pANDs That Aaron Rogers guy can't be much better than Stafford. He gets to play the Lions twice a year and Stafford never gets to play them.Trickalicious - I don't think it is fair that the division rivals get to play the Lions twice. The Lions NEVER get to play the Lions, let alone twice.
- Top
Comment
-
There was something posted on ESPN a few weeks back regarding who would have the best all time team. The Lakers or Bulls.
While Jordan was the best player IMO, I think the Bulls would be hard pressed to beat a team with Magic, Kareem, Kobe, Shaq etc. The Pistons would have a pretty damned good team too.
Isiah
Joe D
Grant Hill
Rodman
Sheed or Big Ben?
Its tough even coming up with our starting lineup.F#*K OHIO!!!
You're not only an amazingly beautiful man, but you're the greatest football mind to ever exist. <-- Jeffy Shittypants actually posted this. I knew he was in love with me.
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by Futureshock View PostThe 90s wasn't the best era for shooting guards either so I guess that Jordan guy isn't all that either.
In his prime Kareem was un guardable by anyone not named Chaimberlain. In fact, Kareem infuriated Wilt because he TOOK the mantle from him. He hated Kareem with a passion and I remember those two going at it really good with Kareem winning most.
You can't diminish a man's worth because noone else can better him. That's a foolish arguement.
pANDs That Aaron Rogers guy can't be much better than Stafford. He gets to play the Lions twice a year and Stafford never gets to play them.
The QB comparison is stupid. QBs don't defend each other.
And the 90's were the deepest era for SGs ever. Clyde Drexler was one of the top 5 SGs of all time. There were still people wondering if he was secretly better than Jordan heading into the 1992 Finals. Then Jordan sodomized him on national TV two quarters into game one and no one asked that question ever again.
The 70's were the best era for....cocaine, I guess? It was the least competitive in the NBA, for sure.
Kareem never had another guy like that to measure himself against in his prime unless you include old man Wilt and a healthy Bill Walton for one yer, and Walton was easily better than Kareem for that period.
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by jaadam4 View PostThere was something posted on ESPN a few weeks back regarding who would have the best all time team. The Lakers or Bulls.
While Jordan was the best player IMO, I think the Bulls would be hard pressed to beat a team with Magic, Kareem, Kobe, Shaq etc. The Pistons would have a pretty damned good team too.
Isiah
Joe D
Grant Hill
Rodman
Sheed or Big Ben?
Its tough even coming up with our starting lineup.Trickalicious - I don't think it is fair that the division rivals get to play the Lions twice. The Lions NEVER get to play the Lions, let alone twice.
- Top
Comment
Comment