10 million if he leaves, 26 million if he's franchised. 16 million is the difference. He's worth 16 million for one year.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
At what point will all you assholes just believe.
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by froot loops View Post10 million if he leaves, 26 million if he's franchised. 16 million is the difference. He's worth 16 million for one year.
Yeah, I can definitely see the Lions pulling the trigger on what effectively would be $16 million.
- Top
Comment
-
What's the record for a guy coming off the franchise tag and resigning (2016 thinking) ? I get the impression it's like a big FU by the organization, and he's going to be leaving the following year.The only thing missing from that Marvin Jones touchdown reversal is that it wasn't a first round playoff game.
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by unknown lions fan View PostWhat's the record for a guy coming off the franchise tag and resigning (2016 thinking) ? I get the impression it's like a big FU by the organization, and he's going to be leaving the following year.
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by chemiclord View PostIn most cases, once a franchise tag is applied, a long term contract follows. It's actually pretty rare for someone hit with a franchise tag to play it out.
Also, it just seems that franchised players are unhappy players. Am I wrong?The only thing missing from that Marvin Jones touchdown reversal is that it wasn't a first round playoff game.
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by froot loops View PostThe franchise tag would probably be a one time thing. A 2016 tag would be 37 million.
But chemiclord is correct, the tag generally brings a long term deal.I long for a Lions team that is consistently competitive.
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by unknown lions fan View PostOK, now I remember that. But in the Lions case, they've got two massive contracts in Stafford and Johnson, it seems that it would be unlikely they can (or should) put together another top-of-the-league contract with Suh. That's toploading your team cap pretty heavily.
Also, it just seems that franchised players are unhappy players. Am I wrong?
In this case, I really think it's a case of that market value not really being established until the season had started (Watt and McCoy didn't sign extensions until midway through the season), and neither Suh or the Lions wanting to muck around with contract talk until after the season was over.
I honestly think Suh wants the Lions to prove they are turning the corner and are going to remain an elite team rather than a flash in the pan. He's going to be paid. He knows he's going to be paid. But I don't think he wants a Barry Sanders arc where he gets totally demoralized because the Lions can't build a contender.
He wants to pick his spot, but I don't think Detroit is out of the question.
- Top
Comment
Comment