If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
If you are having difficulty logging in, please REFRESH the page and clear your browser cache and try again.
If you still can't get logged in, please try using Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome, Firefox, Opera, or Safari to login. Also be sure you are using the latest version of your browser. Internet Explorer has not been updated in over seven years and will no longer work with the Forum software. Thanks
I debated it with my brothers for nearly three hours. I had not seen 1917 at the time; only Dunkirk.
Nolan is incredible and he has been so prolific that now it seems slightly formulaic. Austere, restrained, technical, and then he opens up the score and the narrative at last (civilian boat scene in Dunkirk). It is almost like the movie was designed for you to not take a full breath until that moment. At the time I would have easily have it fighting top 3 war movies of all time.
1917 feels like a different movie entirely, but has similar effects. It is super literary and the razed city sequence -- a full act before the climax which was equally stunning -- is amazing. Also, plot/characters makes it way more accessible.
I am obviously not settled, but everyone else I've talked to shares your sentiment -- I think my hang up is purely stubbornness. Happy to watch both of them again and that is the true luxury.
I debated it with my brothers for nearly three hours. I had not seen 1917 at the time; only Dunkirk.
Nolan is incredible and he has been so prolific that now it seems slightly formulaic. Austere, restrained, technical, and then he opens up the score and the narrative at last (civilian boat scene in Dunkirk). It is almost like the movie was designed for you to not take a full breath until that moment. At the time I would have easily have it fighting top 3 war movies of all time.
1917 feels like a different movie entirely, but has similar effects. It is super literary and the razed city sequence -- a full act before the climax which was equally stunning -- is amazing. Also, plot/characters makes it way more accessible.
I am obviously not settled, but everyone else I've talked to shares your sentiment -- I think my hang up is purely stubbornness. Happy to watch both of them again and that is the true luxury.
I didn't understand a word of that (🥴) ... but I liked 1917 better cuz I thought it just made you care more about the characters
WHO CARES why it says paper jam when there is no paper jam?
I damn near typed the same thing. He sounds like he knows what he’s saying but I guess I didn’t have the patience or the “edumacation” to understand it
F#*K OHIO!!!
You're not only an amazingly beautiful man, but you're the greatest football mind to ever exist. <-- Jeffy Shittypants actually posted this. I knew he was in love with me.
"Train to Busan" is a really good/entertaining zombie movie. On Netflix. Probably up there with "28 Days Later" when it comes to my favorite movies involving zombies.
Yeah, same.
Very positive reviews so far. Tried to skim through the reviews while avoiding spoilers.
One nitpick saying it's "humorless." What, does every blockbuster have to be a Marvel movie all of a sudden? F*** off. I'll leave it at that.
I still don't feel comfortable going to a theater, but if anyone has a positive experience, please share. Maybe movie theaters figured something out.
Humorless, yea. Nolan getting backlash for the sterile narrative -- definitely not a complaint of mine. I walk into those movies with informed expectations.
Thoughts on the new “The Batman” trailer? Don’t know how many times they can rehash the same character, but I thought the trailer looks intriguing. Seems grittier than previous iterations anyway.
Comment