Announcement

Collapse

Please support the Forum by using the Amazon Link this Holiday Season

Amazon has started their Black Friday sales and there are some great deals to be had! As you shop this holiday season, please consider using the forum's Amazon.com link (listed in the menu as "Amazon Link") to add items to your cart and purchase them. The forum gets a small commission from every item sold.

Additionally, the forum gets a "bounty" for various offers at Amazon.com. For instance, if you sign up for a 30 day free trial of Amazon Prime, the forum will earn $3. Same if you buy a Prime membership for someone else as a gift! Trying out or purchasing an Audible membership will earn the forum a few bucks. And creating an Amazon Business account will send a $15 commission our way.

If you have an Amazon Echo, you need a free trial of Amazon Music!! We will earn $3 and it's free to you!

Your personal information is completely private, I only get a list of items that were ordered/shipped via the link, no names or locations or anything. This does not cost you anything extra and it helps offset the operating costs of this forum, which include our hosting fees and the yearly registration and licensing fees.

Stay safe and well and thank you for your participation in the Forum and for your support!! --Deborah

Here is the link:
Click here to shop at Amazon.com
See more
See less

U of M thread (in the Lions Forum) :)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • RPI Help

    The Ratings Percentage Index (RPI) is the formula used by the NCAA to rate men’s and women’s college basketball teams. The formula is described below.
    The RPI is calculated by adding three parts.
    Part I (25% of the formula): Team winning percentage. For the 2005 season, the NCAA added a bonus/penalty system, where each home win or road loss get multiplied by 0.6 in the winning percentage calculation. A home loss or road win is multiplied by 1.4. Neutral games count as 1.0. More on the effect of these changes can be found here.
    Part II (50%): Average opponents’ winning percentage. To calculate this, you must calculate each opponent’s winning percentage individually and average those figures. This is NOT calculated from the opponents’ combined record. Games involving the team for whom we are calculating the RPI are ignored.
    Part III (25%): Average opponents’ opponents’ winning percentage: Basically taking all of the opponents’ Part II values and averaging them.
    Only games against other teams playing a mostly D1 schedule count when computing the RPI.
    Here’s a simple example of how it’s calculated:
    Team A has played two games and beat Team B and Team C.
    Team B has a 1-1 record. Team B beat a team with a 2-1 record and lost to 2-0 Team A.
    Team C has a 1-2 record. Team C beat a team with a 0-2 record, lost to a team with a 2-0 record, and lost to Team A.
    So now let’s see how to compute Team A’s RPI.
    At 2-0, their winning pct. is 1.000.
    Their average opponents’ winning percentage (OWP):
    Team B is 1-0 (1.000) without the loss to Team A. Team C is 1-1 (.500) without the loss to Team A. So the OWP is (1.000 + .500)/2 = .750.
    Their average opponents’ opponents’ winning percentage (OOWP):
    To do this, we need Team B’s and Team C’s OWP. When removing Team B’s results, Team B’s opponents are 2-0 and 1-0 for an average of 1.000. Team C’s opponents are 0-1, 1-0, and 1-0 for an average of .667. The average of these two numbers is .833.
    So Team A’s RPI is 1/4 X (1) + 1/2 X (.75) + 1/4 X (.833) = .8333
    Here’s how other columns in the RPI grid are computed…
    SOS (Strength of Schedule): This is the last two components of the RPI formula:
    (2/3) X Opponents Winning Pct. + (1/3) X Opponents Opponents Winning Pct.
    Non Conference RPI: This is computed applying the basic RPI formula only to a team’s non-conference games. A common misconception is that a team’s non conference RPI will remain the same after they have played their last non-conference opponent. This is not true because a team’s non-conference opponents’ records and their opponents’ records change as they play their conference games. This can have a substantial effect on the NCRPI. For example, in 2003 Alabama’s NCRPI had a ranking of #23 when they entered conference play. By the end of the regular season it had risen to #3.
    L10 (Last 10 Games): A team’s record in their last 10 games against Division I opponents.
    RD/NT (Road/Neutral Record): A team’s record away from its home court.
    Forever One!

    Comment


    • Michigan comes from 12 down in the 2nd half to beat Minnesota!

      That should punch their ticket to the big dance. Hell of a job by Beilien.

      Sims has been awesome the last 3 weeks. Totally dominating offensively.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Kstat View Post
        Michigan comes from 12 down in the 2nd half to beat Minnesota!

        That should punch their ticket to the big dance. Hell of a job by Beilien.
        Big Win, Minny on the road will help the RPI tremendously. They are a top 50 team.
        The Lions went 11-5 in 2014

        Comment


        • Michigan has now swept the other two big ten teams on the bubble, northwestern and minnesota. I don't see any way the committee leaves them off now.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Kstat View Post
            Michigan comes from 12 down in the 2nd half to beat Minnesota!

            That should punch their ticket to the big dance. Hell of a job by Beilien.

            Sims has been awesome the last 3 weeks. Totally dominating offensively.
            Half way through that game I was cursng Beilien, and not for the first time. They were killing us inside and we had Wright on the pine in favor of Novak.

            You have to love Beilien and the way he gets the team to play hard and in his scheme. But man, he can be stubborn with his philosophy. Even with the stubborness I am glad he is here getting max effort and focus from his guys, something we have been sorely lacking since the fab 5. There is obviously a method to his madness.
            The Lions went 11-5 in 2014

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Kstat View Post
              Michigan has now swept the other two big ten teams on the bubble, northwestern and minnesota. I don't see any way the committee leaves them off now.
              I still think U-M needs one more. 20 is the magic number that the committee can't seem to ignore when you consider the quality wins Michigan has had. I think 19 leaves them on the outside looking in.

              Comment


              • It's just nice that it is not a done deal at this point.
                To be a professional means that you don't die. - Takeru "the Tsunami" Kobayashi

                Comment


                • yeah win the first game in the Big Ten Tourney and that should be enough. Michigan would have 20 wins and 10 wins in the Big Ten (reg. season and tourney) it would be very hard to leave them off then.
                  2012 Detroit Lions Draft: 1) Cordy Glenn G , 2) Brandon Taylor S, 3) Sean Spence olb, 4) Joe Adams WR/KR, 5) Matt McCants OT, 7a) B.J. Coleman QB 7b) Kewshan Martin WR

                  Comment


                  • Michigan has been left out of the dance before with 19 wins so I take nothing for granted.

                    Kstat, that post about the final 3 minutes of the Wisconsin game was deja vu. I don't think MSU had a field goal attempt in the final 3 minutes of their game against Michigan in Ann Arbor, and I can't remember how many Iowa had down the stretch of that game either.

                    If Michigan loses in the 1st round of the BTT I think they are going to the NIT. Had they held on against Iowa or pulled off a W against any of MSU, UCONN or Wisky it would be rock solid.
                    Upgrade DB, LB, OL in the offseason and I will gladly drink the cool-aid and eat corn bread all season long.

                    Comment


                    • Man I hope we make the tourney this year. I'm sick of not seeing our names on the brackets.
                      F#*K OHIO!!!

                      You're not only an amazingly beautiful man, but you're the greatest football mind to ever exist. <-- Jeffy Shittypants actually posted this. I knew he was in love with me.

                      Comment


                      • Who is UM likely to draw in the first round of the BTT?
                        ------------
                        <<< Jana Cova ...again (8 <<<

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Drew View Post
                          Who is UM likely to draw in the first round of the BTT?
                          Iowa I believe (with a possible Purdue 2nd round)
                          Follow me on Twitter--@Schottey

                          Comment


                          • Iowa with Illinois in the 2nd round. They're in the right side of the bracket, that's for sure. BTW, they're in right now, win or lose.

                            Comment


                            • Up 22 in the first half vs Iowa. I thinks we can stamp our ticket. They look good enough to make a run in the Big 10 tourney and maybe get up to a 7 seed.
                              The Lions went 11-5 in 2014

                              Comment


                              • As long as they don't get a 5 seed, I want no part of one of those mid-major 12 seeds.

                                When Harris and Sims are playing like this (against Iowa) they are one of the best teams in the nation. Too bad it doesn't happen much more often.
                                Follow me on Twitter--@Schottey

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X