Originally posted by jaadam4
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
Please support the Forum by using the Amazon Link this Holiday Season
Amazon has started their Black Friday sales and there are some great deals to be had! As you shop this holiday season, please consider using the forum's Amazon.com link (listed in the menu as "Amazon Link") to add items to your cart and purchase them. The forum gets a small commission from every item sold.
Additionally, the forum gets a "bounty" for various offers at Amazon.com. For instance, if you sign up for a 30 day free trial of Amazon Prime, the forum will earn $3. Same if you buy a Prime membership for someone else as a gift! Trying out or purchasing an Audible membership will earn the forum a few bucks. And creating an Amazon Business account will send a $15 commission our way.
If you have an Amazon Echo, you need a free trial of Amazon Music!! We will earn $3 and it's free to you!
Your personal information is completely private, I only get a list of items that were ordered/shipped via the link, no names or locations or anything. This does not cost you anything extra and it helps offset the operating costs of this forum, which include our hosting fees and the yearly registration and licensing fees.
Stay safe and well and thank you for your participation in the Forum and for your support!! --Deborah
Here is the link:
Click here to shop at Amazon.com
Additionally, the forum gets a "bounty" for various offers at Amazon.com. For instance, if you sign up for a 30 day free trial of Amazon Prime, the forum will earn $3. Same if you buy a Prime membership for someone else as a gift! Trying out or purchasing an Audible membership will earn the forum a few bucks. And creating an Amazon Business account will send a $15 commission our way.
If you have an Amazon Echo, you need a free trial of Amazon Music!! We will earn $3 and it's free to you!
Your personal information is completely private, I only get a list of items that were ordered/shipped via the link, no names or locations or anything. This does not cost you anything extra and it helps offset the operating costs of this forum, which include our hosting fees and the yearly registration and licensing fees.
Stay safe and well and thank you for your participation in the Forum and for your support!! --Deborah
Here is the link:
Click here to shop at Amazon.com
See more
See less
U of M thread (in the Lions Forum) :)
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by kreton View Post
I'm not saying Shroud had a terrible day, but he did have a bad 2nd half even without the picks. More though, that first INT specifically, he lost his composure and threw a terrible pass. Houston can have him.
Those are plays where Stroud was just trying to make shit happen. Granted he wasn’t under any duress for the majority of the day.
But if we’re comparing him to Fields, I like Stroud all day long. I hate Ohio QBs but he’s one that I’d takeF#*K OHIO!!!
You're not only an amazingly beautiful man, but you're the greatest football mind to ever exist. <-- Jeffy Shittypants actually posted this. I knew he was in love with me.
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by jaadam4 View Post
The game was over by the time the last INT came into play. The shovel pass INT was tipped by the intended target or it wouldn’t have been catchable.
Those are plays where Stroud was just trying to make shit happen. Granted he wasn’t under any duress for the majority of the day.
But if we’re comparing him to Fields, I like Stroud all day long. I hate Ohio QBs but he’s one that I’d take
Stroud benefits from have amazing playmakers around him. Launching balls to Harrison on plays where he leaves the huddle knowing where the ball is going works in college, but going through progressions is a necessity in the NFL.
Now I'm not saying that Stroud doesn't have those skills, but in big games, they don't seem to be on display. Admittedly I watch OSU once a year. So I've seen Stroud twice. And he put up yards, but he did not make plays when they were needed. I've never seen him go through progressions well to find the 2nd or 3rd receiver. Could be because he doesn't need to. I don't know. But he hasn't shown it (again in the 2 games vs Michigan). He hasn't shown the ability to handle pressure in the backfield well. He gets nervous and makes hasty decisions.
He will go top 10. Very likely still top 5. But yesterday he hurt his stock. He wasn't a lock for #1 overall before the game, and he isn't after the game. He could go #1. I'm not saying Houston won't take him, but right now I don't think they would.
- Top
Comment
-
I don’t disagree with any of that, I’m saying his throws were dead on. Michigan’s DBs were all over their WR and Strouds windows were very small. I like accurate pocket passers and that’s what he is. If you look at his completions they were beautiful throws, he wasn’t just chucking
Ohio QBs don’t tend to be great at reading defense which is why I don’t like them. That’s why I’d draft and sit him for a year to learnF#*K OHIO!!!
You're not only an amazingly beautiful man, but you're the greatest football mind to ever exist. <-- Jeffy Shittypants actually posted this. I knew he was in love with me.
- Top
Comment
-
Damn, Michigan has got some running backs, don't they? You'd think you lose a guy like Corum for the year, that a run-heavy offense like Michigan would be in trouble.
Nope. Next man up gashes the Buckeyes, and is carving up Purdue just as explosively. Edwards is something else. Imagine what he could do with both hands.
- Top
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Purdue was no shit though. That Qb was throwing into small ass windows.
i can’t believe Ohio is going to back into the playoffsF#*K OHIO!!!
You're not only an amazingly beautiful man, but you're the greatest football mind to ever exist. <-- Jeffy Shittypants actually posted this. I knew he was in love with me.
- Top
Comment
-
With the Buckeyes, it really is a case of "who would you put at #4 instead?"
Do you give a 2-loss USC team the spot? Sure, they actually made it to their conference championship game, but they had two bites of the apple with Utah, and lost both, the second time in embarrassing fashion.
Alabama? Has the same detriment as OSU (didn't even qualify for the conference championship game), but with the additional detriment of two losses, and no particularly impressive wins. Ohio State can at the very least say their only loss came to a team already in the playoff.
Tennessee? The team that South Carolina hung 63 on? Whose biggest win was a squeaker against Alabama? And has lost Hooker for the season?
Penn State? Who lost to both Michigan and OSU and didn't look particularly impressive in either of them?
Clemson? Who looked like utter dog shite at the end of the season in losses to Notre Dame and South Carolina?
Do you put Kansas State or Utah in? Even though they won their respective conference championship games, we're talking three loss teams at this point.
- Top
Comment
-
The only question is OSU 3 or 4. I think they should be 4. A one loss TCU should not get punished for playing in a CCG while OSU gets rewarded for not making it to theirs
Not sure the committee will see it that way, but the oddsmakers do.I feel like I am watching the destruction of our democracy while my neighbors and friends cheer it on
- Top
- Likes 1
Comment
-
I was meaning that more in a fuck Ohio way. I get why they’ll be there. Besides Georgia and Alabama who’s on a whole different level and salary cap for recruiting, Ohio is elite. They have more 5 star recruits than most of the Big Ten programs combined.
I just can’t believe their luck that both USC and TCU lost in the same weekend. That would have never happened to Michigan like that.
This also means that they’re going to be a week more rested and didn’t have any injuries like the other programs did during the conference championship rounds.F#*K OHIO!!!
You're not only an amazingly beautiful man, but you're the greatest football mind to ever exist. <-- Jeffy Shittypants actually posted this. I knew he was in love with me.
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by CGVT View PostThe only question is OSU 3 or 4. I think they should be 4. A one loss TCU should not get punished for playing in a CCG while OSU gets rewarded for not making it to theirs
Not sure the committee will see it that way, but the oddsmakers do.F#*K OHIO!!!
You're not only an amazingly beautiful man, but you're the greatest football mind to ever exist. <-- Jeffy Shittypants actually posted this. I knew he was in love with me.
- Top
Comment
-
Originally posted by CGVT View PostThe only question is OSU 3 or 4. I think they should be 4. A one loss TCU should not get punished for playing in a CCG while OSU gets rewarded for not making it to theirs
Not sure the committee will see it that way, but the oddsmakers do.
As for Ohio State at #3, Wolvy needs to be careful about wishing for that. It's hard to beat the same team twice in a season. Just ask Alabama or TCU.
But I do agree with Jaad on this thing; if it was a 1-loss Michigan team that had been beaten by over twenty by Ohio State, the Wolverines aren't even in the discussion right now. The Committee would happily keep USC or vault Alabama over them.
- Top
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by jaadam4 View Post
This also means that they’re going to be a week more rested and didn’t have any injuries like the other programs did during the conference championship rounds.
- Top
Comment
Comment