If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
If you are having difficulty logging in, please REFRESH the page and clear your browser cache and try again.
If you still can't get logged in, please try using Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome, Firefox, Opera, or Safari to login. Also be sure you are using the latest version of your browser. Internet Explorer has not been updated in over seven years and will no longer work with the Forum software. Thanks
That would be nice but you ahve not presented the case that Nebraska is better.
What you have presented has failed. That UofM is equal to MSU.
LOL!!! You are like talking to a brick wall.
Nebraska kicked your ass, played a tougher schedule, and has essentially the same record that you do. What case needs to be made? It's pretty obvious Nebraska was a better team than you.
There is no other factor that indicates MSU is better than Michigan. Head to head is the ONLY factor tipped towards MSU. Every other factor is almost exactly equal. So yes, you are using head-to-head exclusively.
So if every other factor is equal and Head to head favors MSU... wouldn't that mean MSU is better?
BTW the schedules were not remotely equal.
Rashean Mathis: "I'm an egg guy. Last year we didn't have (the omelet station). I didn't complain, but I was dying inside."
Nebraska kicked your ass, played a tougher schedule, and has essentially the same record that you do. What case needs to be made? It's pretty obvious Nebraska was a better team than you.
Iowa.
Rashean Mathis: "I'm an egg guy. Last year we didn't have (the omelet station). I didn't complain, but I was dying inside."
BTW you have mentioned Nebraska every post since I predicted you would. You have no other points. I have many points.
Yes, you have many non-sensical points like whatever that gunk you were talking about Houston, and lots of made-up shit like what you believe would happen in some magical 10-game series. You have very few points grounded anywhere in reality.
Yes, once again the objective rankings are wrong--only MSU fans know the truth!!!
I bring up Nebraska only because it blows a hole the size of the titanic in your entire argument. You can't use some games as a 100% statement of strength yet pretend other games didn't mean anything, and that is exactly what you are trying to do. I've never tried to do either of those things with Iowa, yet you are doing so with both Nebraska AND Notre Dame.
I bring up Nebraska because, any argument that makes it clear that MSU is better than Michigan also makes it clear that Nebraska is better than MSU. Yet you cherry-pick the MSU is better than Michigan point and completely deny the Nebraska is better than MSU point.
Tweet
Comment