Originally posted by Topweasel
View Post
Ya, Marion is the one who is owns the controlling stock but for anyone to suggest that a husband and wife do not have mingled interest in investments or income streams is plain irresponsible. While they have children that they can name as inheritors of their holdings, who do you think has first inheritance rights?
Not even talking about inheriting, explain to me how a husband and wife do not have intermingled finances? ........and no input to possibly increasing the income stream......
The ownership in her name is strictly to stay within the rules of the sports franchises need to make sure that there are no ties to gambling. Can anyone honestly say that if your wife has a major share in a Casino you have no ties to gambling?
Comment