Be easier to make a deal for Garrett if they didn’t trade away 3rd and 4th round picks in this years draft last year.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
NFL News
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by chemiclord View PostThe Lions could pursue Garrett, and could hypothetically even win that bidding war.
But what are you willing to give up for that? While the cap is going to go up, no one knows how much. Are you willing to risk having to let Kerby test free agency? Branch? LaPorta? Hutchinson? I know it's real popular to give up on JaMo already, but just letting him walk probably won't offset the contract Garret has or potentially will have. If the Lions were to bring in Garrett, you have to figure at least two of the guys the Lions drafted and are already core players are going to have to be let go.
If that's okay with you... then fine? But that doesn't seem to be something the Lions are willing to do, and there is a lot of precedent to suggest it's not the smart short or long term play either. The teams that are consistently in contention generally don't make such big, splashy, future-mortgaging deals. What they do do is draft well and find impact players on bargain deals.GO LIONS "24" !!
- Top
Comment
-
NEW YORK—Leaping at the opportunity to make their intentions clear, numerous NFL front offices expressed interest this week in quarterback Aaron Rodgers playing elsewhere, sources confirmed Tuesday. “Aaron Rodgers feels like he could be a great fit for the culture of other places,” said an anonymous NFC general manager among the flurry of teams across […]"Yeah, we just... we don't want them to go. So that's our motivation."
Dan Campbell at Green Bay, January 8, 2023.
- Top
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by ghandi View PostI could see how Aaron might be better than a couple of teams current QBs, but to call him a "great fit for the culture" sounds like a bit of a reach.WHO CARES why it says paper jam when there is no paper jam?
- Top
- Likes 1
Comment
Comment