If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
If you are having difficulty logging in, please REFRESH the page and clear your browser cache and try again.
If you still can't get logged in, please try using Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome, Firefox, Opera, or Safari to login. Also be sure you are using the latest version of your browser. Internet Explorer has not been updated in over seven years and will no longer work with the Forum software. Thanks
In real time , I thought Branch made a terrible play and deserved the penalty. In college, that is an automatic targeting call and an ejection. The NFL does have verbiage to eject players on plays like that, but I don't ever recall seeing it. It's one thing if the league does it regularly, but they don't. It didn't seem like it was worse than other plays, there was a play at the end of regulation where the Seahawks safety blew up a long pass where he led with his helmet and there was no call at all.
There was a flag. But the refs picked it up. Ha
It was a very similar play. The yardage from catch or penalty would have likely won it for LA in reg.
I think we're also seeing the impact of the Lions having flipped their reputation. There really wasn't much home cooking for the Packers today (the ejection of Branch was done from the league office). The Lions are a contender now. They are one of the "elite" teams in the league. The reputation calls are now starting to happen more in their favor, and we saw it today. The Packers had more penalties and yardage against (and that's even with Branch giving them 30).
You think individual officiating crews work alone or do they work for the league office and do what the league office says? The "LEAQUE" wanted the Lions to lose this game so the competition for first place in the best division in baseball, the NFC North, remained very much as close a competition as they can get.
You think individual officiating crews work alone or do they work for the league office and do what the league office says? The "LEAQUE" wanted the Lions to lose this game so the competition for first place in the best division in baseball, the NFC North, remained very much as close a competition as they can get.
"The Brian Branch ejection was pure BS, but the team played above that to secure the win."
----------------------------Yes it was. It was bullshit because the play happens all the time without ejection. Want to change the rule change the rule don't make Detroit an example. Plain and simple the league wanted the Lions to lose this game. A loss keeps the division close and much more interesting. The league was going to do what they could to help that desire along but the Lions are to good for that BULLSHIT now.
I think we're also seeing the impact of the Lions having flipped their reputation. There really wasn't much home cooking for the Packers today (the ejection of Branch was done from the league office). The Lions are a contender now. They are one of the "elite" teams in the league. The reputation calls are now starting to happen more in their favor, and we saw it today. The Packers had more penalties and yardage against (and that's even with Branch giving them 30).
Is that really it or has the talent level gotten high enough that they don't have to be stupid to get the job done?
"Your division isn't going through Green Bay it's going through Detroit for the next five years" - Rex Ryan
Is that really it or has the talent level gotten high enough that they don't have to be stupid to get the job done?
Column A, Column B, I'd say. The talent level is a massive factor at preventing the sort of penalties that come from simply being beat. But there are absolutely "reputation" calls, things where teams that are perceived to be "good" get a leeway that "bad" teams simply don't.
Comment