If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
If you are having difficulty logging in, please REFRESH the page and clear your browser cache and try again.
If you still can't get logged in, please try using Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome, Firefox, Opera, or Safari to login. Also be sure you are using the latest version of your browser. Internet Explorer has not been updated in over seven years and will no longer work with the Forum software. Thanks
Agree. I would probably go for both. In a 32" you can get a pretty good price without breaking the bank.
BTW, I found this:
In the United States, 1080p over-the-air broadcasts still do not exist as of 2010; all major networks use either 720p60 or 1080i60 encoded with MPEG-2. However, satellite service has many channels that utilize the 1080p/24-30 format with MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 encoding (e.g. DirecTV, XstreamHD, and Dish Network).
So it looks to me as if the cable companies don't broadcast in 1080p but the satellite companies do. (I have DTV)
I have a 46" Sony (120 hz, 150k:1 contrast) and a 32" Vizio (60 hz, 12k:1 contrast ratio) There is a large difference in picture, due to both of those specs. Fast moving objects on the screen have a slightly visible blur on the Vizio, which is non-existent on the Sony. But I am extremely satisfied with both products in relation to their age/price paid. Point being, you get what you pay for.
A friend of mine has worked for Sears (in the electronics dept) and Best Buy and he's told me on several occasions that, on the floor, they adjust the display settings on the televisions to make certain models look better than others to increase sales of those televisions. So, if you're shopping for televisions, ask a sales associate to switch the televisions which interest you to the default display settings before comparing picture quality.
And I'm not surprised my cable company lied to me...they have a near monopoly in this area and don't plan on giving that up by telling people that a satellite provider offers a better picture than they do.
"Low on the totem, till he showed 'em defiance, giant scrotum"
A friend of mine has worked for Sears (in the electronics dept) and Best Buy and he's told me on several occasions that, on the floor, they adjust the display settings on the televisions to make certain models look better than others to increase sales of those televisions.
Reminds me of a friend that managed a Foot Locker store. I was talking to him about selling shoes, fitting runners etc etc. He laughed and said the only factor determing what shoe was right for a person was whether he had it in stock or not. That was a bit of an eye opener...
I feel like I am watching the destruction of our democracy while my neighbors and friends cheer it on
Reminds me of a friend that managed a Foot Locker store. I was talking to him about selling shoes, fitting runners etc etc. He laughed and said the only factor determing what shoe was right for a person was whether he had it in stock or not. That was a bit of an eye opener...
That's poor salesmanship and laziness. If I don't have something in stock for a customer, I'll get it for them. There are plenty of options for me to get whatever it is within 30 minutes. It's not like I have to manufacture the product for them...I make a phone call and go get it for you.
"Low on the totem, till he showed 'em defiance, giant scrotum"
I think SAMSUNG and MITSU may have cleaned up their DLP rainbow effect issues in 2009 so they could be on the right track now.
I still wouldn't touch their gear.
My issue is that my Sony Tv's want to live forever and it is so hard to move on from multi thousand dollar units into another one just because the tech changed some.
That's poor salesmanship and laziness. If I don't have something in stock for a customer, I'll get it for them. There are plenty of options for me to get whatever it is within 30 minutes. It's not like I have to manufacture the product for them...I make a phone call and go get it for you.
Eh. Not a big deal. I think it is about working for a commission and putting food on the table. Do you really think the kid wanting a pair of kicks for 50 bucks was going to wait at Footlocker for a half hour for shoes to come from across town when he could just walk past the food court to the next sporting goods store and buy what ever they had there? If the customer walks out of the store, he's not coming back. I don't blame the guy, but by the same token, I don't let anyone "sell" me anything either.
Eh. Not a big deal. I think it is about working for a commission and putting food on the table. Do you really think the kid wanting a pair of kicks for 50 bucks was going to wait at Footlocker for a half hour for shoes to come from across town when he could just walk past the food court to the next sporting goods store and buy what ever they had there? If the customer walks out of the store, he's not coming back. I don't blame the guy, but by the same token, I don't let anyone "sell" me anything either.
point taken...I guess I was trying to compare apples to oranges.
"Low on the totem, till he showed 'em defiance, giant scrotum"
I pretty much just find a model I like and keep on buying them. Asics 2100s, (I think its up to 2160). Although I have a Nike Triax pair that lasted a long time, I might check them out again.
I'm the same way, Loops. I wear the Asic Gel Cumulus. I buy the old models on line at a significant saving from the latest model.
I always recommend that a new runner go to a good running store and get fitted for the proper shoe, though. (and you are correct, Footlocker doesn't fail into the good running store category...)
I feel like I am watching the destruction of our democracy while my neighbors and friends cheer it on
Comment