Originally posted by Coop
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
OT: Technology and Geek Stuff Thread
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Jdoggie View PostNot saying it isn't a great format, but the most common most would encode there music to is .wma and .mp3.
Aslo, wmas are smaller then .mp3s and sound just as good.
Well the disadvantage is when you encode all your music to them, then you decide one day that you might want to purchase a different player, you have a bunch or songs you can't use or have to recode.
Mp3s and WMA will always be two of the best formats. MP3 because it is so universal and wma because most people own PCs.
Again wma and mp3 are the most widely used and most accessable to everyone.
Originally posted by Jdoggie View PostIt does support mp3s and that is a good thing, but it should support .wma as well. The default is Apple format, so it is not REQUIRED, just encouraged.
Originally posted by Jdoggie View PostIt matters because the trend is moving toward video and music players. I do reencode so shrink the flie size, but most will play exactly as they are.
Originally posted by Jdoggie View PostThere is a 60G Zen. Twice would be 120G.Last edited by Larsky; February 15, 2007, 01:11 PM."To alcohol! The cause of—and solution to—all of life's problems." —Homer Simpson, 1997
- Top
Comment
-
I'm in Michigan today--flew in yesterday to visit my brother and see the Dave Holland Big Band at the Michigan Theater in Ann Arbor tonight. Then it's off to Boston to visit some more old friends, then back to Oakland on Tuesday.
For my last three flights, I've brought my Sennheiser PXC-250 Noise-Cancelling headphones, and I can't believe the difference they make. Usually I just wear them and don't plug into anything. They cut the roaring background noise by more than half. I really notice the difference at the end of the flight; I'm happier, less fatigued, etc. I also used them to plug into my Palm Zire 72s (which, as I've mentioned before, I've repurposed into a handheld video player), and listened to the iPod using them. It's nice because, otherwise, I'd have to crank of the volume to hear over the background noise, possibly damaging my hearing.
I don't think I'll ever fly again without noise-cancelling headphones. The problem is, there are a lot of crappy quality headphones out there that claim to be "noise-cancelling," but just don't work that well. Bose makes some nice ones, but they cost $300 to $350 apiece, and they're the full "cup over the ear" design, meaning (1) they're really isolating, and (2) they're not as portable. The Sennheisers fold up easily, you can buy them now for under $100, and many people say they work almost as well as the Bose.
Check them out here:
"To alcohol! The cause of—and solution to—all of life's problems." —Homer Simpson, 1997
- Top
Comment
-
That's right, but the over-the-ear closed models physically block out a lot of the other noise, along with the filtered "anti-noise."
The Sennheisers I use just filter out the constant background noise. On my flight from DFW to Detroit, I was in the back of a plane that has rear mounted engines (a McDonnell S-80, I believe), so I was right next to the engine. It was quite loud. The Sennheisers did a great job of filtering out the noise, so much so that I could actually hear the guy talking next to me more clearly, even though I was wearing headphones!
Bose is the acknowledged leader in the noise-cancelling HF market, but Sennheisers are the acknowledged not-too-far-behind runner-ups. At 1/3 of the price, I'll take the Sennheisers. But if I was doing air travel weekly, I might spring for the Bose, but everything I've read indicates that there not that much better than the Sennheisers."To alcohol! The cause of—and solution to—all of life's problems." —Homer Simpson, 1997
- Top
Comment
Comment