Originally posted by froot loops
View Post
They traded away any young player worth a shit to the point they had nothing on the farm.
They signed guys to lucrative contracts in their declining years - so much so they were choked with "dead" money trapped in under-productive players relative to what they were getting paid.
There are two absolutes here:
1) Yes, they were fleeced in the trade.
2) No, they weren't winning shit if they kept Verlander - and hadn't for 3 years.
Only people who would think that number 2 is wrong is people expecting other team to trade their best young players for wooden nickels OR that they should have ran a 300+ million payroll - because that is what it would have took to carry all this dead weight AND bring in established players - who don't come cheap.
Comment