![]() |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Yankton SD
Posts: 111
|
WEEK 5.. Pittsburgh at Detroit thread..
Have at it!
Pittsburgh has a lacking offense, only scoring 2 more pts than the Lions thus far.. But the Lions have allowed nearly twice as many as the Steelers. I'm thinking that unless Detroit can turn it around on special teams and defense its going to be 42 Pittsburgh, 24 Detroit.
__________________
Lions 4-12 in 2008? (Nope) 4-12 in 2009? (Nope) For the love of GOD.. 4-12 in 2010??? Lovin and Hatin the Lions out here in South Dakota. And I ain't adopting any more Lions either. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: FLORIDA BABY
Posts: 3,186
|
Pitt has the 3rd best rushing D and the 7th best overall. Detroit wont score 24 points. Rothlkjhgfer has a big game, this one is gonna be ugly. Pray for rain. This one is actually on TV here in Orlando so I wont need a link. Not sure if I wanna watch anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor MI.
Posts: 13,207
|
Lions 27 Steelers 24.
GO LIONS "09" !!!!!!!!!
__________________
Take us to the promised land Matt. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cape May NJ
Posts: 9,037
|
Steelers 42-Lions 27
__________________
That's the King of hyperbole. Even his hyperbole is exaggerated.-DanO |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,546
|
There is no way in hell the Lions score 27 in this one - and besides they will probably need to score 40+ to win anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cape May NJ
Posts: 9,037
|
So what is your prediction, dickhead?
__________________
That's the King of hyperbole. Even his hyperbole is exaggerated.-DanO |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,546
|
Steelers 41
Lions 10 Only way that 10 is higher is if the Lions defense or ST scores. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Panama City, Florida
Posts: 8,643
|
They performed well against a couple of good run defenses so far, but if KS's shoulder is still hurting him and he plans to favor it and fall on first contact, forget it. They need success in the running game, if they plan on having any time to throw. The Steeler pass rush will be on top of the QB within seconds, if they're allowed to pin their ears back.
__________________
-------------- <<<<Erin O'Brien<<< |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 799
|
It depends if Matt starts or not. Culpepper still doesn't seem to want to throw the ball downfield. Last week he didn't throw to calvin once.
If Mathew starts the lions win 27-21 If culpepper starts lions lose 34-9
__________________
Adopt a lions for 2009 is Jon Jansen, ....." the future is now!!".... Congratulations Mathew Stafford - The Qb of the future! |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,546
|
Harrison is so overdue for a breakout game it isn't funny.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,546
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: SoCal
Posts: 4,242
|
Culpepper starts, Lions 17 - Steelers 132
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 6,653
|
Yeah, Harrison's probably licking his chops with regards to facing Backus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,247
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 799
|
Not that i know of but if cupepper makes the lions punt more, or throws ints, or has a lot of 3 and outs its quite possible he will give the steelers offense more opportunities.
I think the one thing Matt has proven in the past 4 weeks is he can sustain long time consuming drives. That has a direct relationship to the other team scoring. So no matt doesn't play defense, but he does aid the defense with his play.
__________________
Adopt a lions for 2009 is Jon Jansen, ....." the future is now!!".... Congratulations Mathew Stafford - The Qb of the future! |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 799
|
i didn't notice if calvin was in or not, but neither would culpepper. It seemed that DC was using the check down alot more than matt. The lions need someone who can sling it.
__________________
Adopt a lions for 2009 is Jon Jansen, ....." the future is now!!".... Congratulations Mathew Stafford - The Qb of the future! |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,247
|
The point is Johnson wasn't in the game, he was pulled and not in the game for most if not all of Culpepper's snaps so the criticism isn't warranted.....we'll see what happens on Sunday as I don't think Stafford will play, and IMO it would be foolish to put your 41 million dollar investment out there with a knee injury that needs more time to heal......the Steelers defense is a tough task for either QB...the Lions won't run effectively against them and whoever is playing QB is going to be under a lot of pressure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,546
|
Quote:
FTR, you can count the number of deep balls Stafford threw in the entire 2nd half on one hand - 1 and that was the ball to Heller (TE). Everything else was short, because the Bears once they got the lead took away the deep ball. Even Pettigrew's 24 yard catch was virtually all YAC. Stafford was checkdown charlie in the 2nd half - and it was because the Bears weren't giving him the deep ball anymore (anymore than they were giving it to Culpepper). When Stafford did try to look downfield, he got sacked - repeatedly. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 6,653
|
I took the Steelers and the 10.5 points in my pool this week. Not a lot of confidance that they are going to be able to match up physically witht the Steelers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,347
|
Quote:
If Stafford is injured then he shouldn't play. If he is hurt then he should. Going to be playing hurt the rest of his career so he should get used to it ASAP. |
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|