DetroitLionsForum.com
Please support the forum by using this link to shop with our sponsor:

Go Back   DetroitLionsForum.com > Sports Discussion Forums > University of Michigan

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old November 13th, 2016, 10:33 AM   #441
hack
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 12,395
I didn't see how the roughing-the-center call was questionable. You don't expect to get the PI on that interception on the road, but the roughing-the-center call is pretty easy to officiate in comparison with the judgement call when a DB and WR fight for the ball. Michigan had one called on it earlier this year. Is what it is.
hack is online now   Reply With Quote Top
Old November 13th, 2016, 10:34 AM   #442
iam416
Senior Member
 
iam416's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 12,864
Also, the 2nd running into the punter didn't result in anything. Iowa missed a long, ill-conceived FG. M got the ball at the 28 and went down and scored a TD.
__________________
Dan Patrick: What was your reaction to [Urban Meyer being hired]?
Brady Hoke: You know.....not....good.
iam416 is offline   Reply With Quote Top
Old November 13th, 2016, 10:47 AM   #443
entropy
Senior Member
 
entropy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Kansas City MO
Posts: 9,867
Iowa was up for this game to "save" their season. Michigan over looked the haweyes. They are 18-22 yr old kids. It happens.

I really thought Michigan's offensive game plan was vanilla. They basically played to the strengths of Iowa's D. Butt should have had a record day.
__________________
Grammar... The difference between feeling your nuts and feeling you're nuts.
entropy is offline   Reply With Quote Top
Old November 13th, 2016, 10:52 AM   #444
Hannibal
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 7,420
By the time 2019 rolls around, we will have one six point win against a 6-7 OSU team sandwiched between two seven game losing streaks. This loss didn't change my perception of the season one bit, which rests entirely upon the results of our two rivalry games and a CFP appearance.
Hannibal is offline   Reply With Quote Top
Old November 13th, 2016, 11:03 AM   #445
WM Wolverine
Senior Member
 
WM Wolverine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 8,557
re: I didn't see how the roughing-the-center call was questionable.

-

It goes uncalled quite often, many times more blatant than what we saw against M... It was called correctly, for a change.

Play calling was more getting too cute than vanilla. Too many sweeps to the edge when it wasn't working, Peppers play was brutal in such a critical spot... M didn't play Iowa like they've played similar defenses imo...

Two uncalled PI in 4th quarter that would've ended the game. Three or even four long balls where the WR beats his man that Speight misses, one after he hurt his shoulder...
WM Wolverine is offline   Reply With Quote Top
Old November 13th, 2016, 11:05 AM   #446
WM Wolverine
Senior Member
 
WM Wolverine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 8,557
In a close game/ 4th quarter, officials will watch roughing the center more closely as teams will attempt to block the kick.
WM Wolverine is offline   Reply With Quote Top
Old November 15th, 2016, 10:58 AM   #447
Jeff Buchanan
Senior Member
 
Jeff Buchanan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 6,422
This is a really good analysis of where M football is right now and why pre season 10-2 predictions as a ceiling were accurate. The Speight injury, while having the potential to rally a team, is a big deal.

I can see 9-3 with M struggling v IU and loosing as a very realistic possibilty.

http://theozone.net/Ohio-State/Footb...t-for-Fighting
__________________
On Harbaugh's expectations for M football in 2015 (NFL NETWORK): “We'd rather be about it than talk about it."
Jeff Buchanan is offline   Reply With Quote Top
Old November 15th, 2016, 11:10 AM   #448
iam416
Senior Member
 
iam416's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 12,864
I read that earlier. I have the same reaction he does to every DeVeon Smith carry. There is an appreciable, clear difference between him and Evans. I hope to god HARBAUGH gets Smith another 12-15 carries in Columbus.
__________________
Dan Patrick: What was your reaction to [Urban Meyer being hired]?
Brady Hoke: You know.....not....good.
iam416 is offline   Reply With Quote Top
Old November 15th, 2016, 11:14 AM   #449
Hannibal
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 7,420
IMHO breaking tackles is the most overrated quality in running backs. That's not to say I wouldn't like to see some of our guys do it more -- namely Ty Isaac -- but generally the best running backs do their best work before contact.
Hannibal is offline   Reply With Quote Top
Old November 15th, 2016, 11:22 AM   #450
Hannibal
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 7,420
By the way -- isn't the advantage of MANBALL/Harbaughffense supposed to be that you can pick up a first down at the end of a game and put it away? Remember that old argument? Harbaugh's manball offense has been charged with putting a game out of reach by getting a first down (without taking any risks on first or second down) on a final posession four times now by my count, and they are a stark zero for four in that department (2015 MSU, 2016 Wisconsin, 2016 MSU, 2016 Iowa). Last year, we ended the game against MSU with three straight three-and-outs. This year, we ended the Wisky game with two straight three-and-outs. Against MSU this year we gained a paltry one first down in the entire fourth quarter and against Iowa we fell flat on our face at the end when a first down would have ended it.

This is nothing new either. I think that I can count on one hand the amount of times in the entire Lloyd, Mo, and Carr eras that we were able to run the clock out on offense hoding onto a slim lead.

Last edited by Hannibal; November 15th, 2016 at 11:26 AM.
Hannibal is offline   Reply With Quote Top
Old November 15th, 2016, 11:58 AM   #451
Wild Hoss
Senior Member
 
Wild Hoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 4,125
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hannibal View Post
By the way -- isn't the advantage of MANBALL/Harbaughffense supposed to be that you can pick up a first down at the end of a game and put it away? Remember that old argument? Harbaugh's manball offense has been charged with putting a game out of reach by getting a first down (without taking any risks on first or second down) on a final posession four times now by my count, and they are a stark zero for four in that department (2015 MSU, 2016 Wisconsin, 2016 MSU, 2016 Iowa). Last year, we ended the game against MSU with three straight three-and-outs. This year, we ended the Wisky game with two straight three-and-outs. Against MSU this year we gained a paltry one first down in the entire fourth quarter and against Iowa we fell flat on our face at the end when a first down would have ended it.

This is nothing new either. I think that I can count on one hand the amount of times in the entire Lloyd, Mo, and Carr eras that we were able to run the clock out on offense hoding onto a slim lead.
Yeah....but those are all teams with pretty good defensive fronts Hanni, so I think you have to take that into account. I'm sure Jim's approach has ground down a few games against other opponents in those scenarios.

That said, your OC also needs to take that into account. This was a gripe I had with Frank Solich...he too would run into the proverbial wall in these situations, then punt and put the onus on the defense to win the game. Sometimes that's fine, but sometimes not; if getting the first down is critical, you need call plays capable of getting the requisite yardage. They don't have to be a double-reverse, but against a good defense that might require attempting a pass. God forbid.

The other aspect that always puzzled me was that, if the idea is apparently just burn up 30 seconds between plays, then why risk running the ball into the teeth of the defense in the first place? Just go Victory Formation and kneel it.
Wild Hoss is offline   Reply With Quote Top
Old November 15th, 2016, 12:15 PM   #452
Hannibal
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 7,420
Wisky and MSU 2015 were good defensive fronts, but the run defense this year for MSU and Iowa are pretty bad.

I guess what I am trying to say is that one of the supposed benefits of MANBALL is the ability to run out the clock by keeping the ball on the ground, and if anything, I think that the opposite is true. MANBALL sucks for running out the clock. I'll take a spread or a triple option offense in that department any day of the week and twice on Sunday, since those are both offenses that prosper even when you know for sure that the run is coming. I mean, holy shit look at what Navy did to Notre Dame. They held the ball for the last 7:28 of the game!

Last edited by Hannibal; November 15th, 2016 at 12:18 PM.
Hannibal is offline   Reply With Quote Top
Old November 15th, 2016, 01:07 PM   #453
Wild Hoss
Senior Member
 
Wild Hoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 4,125
If the idea is just keep playing offense instead of worrying about grinding clock, then you're talking playcalling more than formation/style.

If the notion is to accept that the defense is going to load the box, but you want to run the ball anyway because burning clock is important, you'll find that many spread OCs will go heavy in those scenarios. You don't want to be running out of 10 or 11 personnel when the defense's focus is on knifing into the backfield because they have nothing to lose.

If you, as a coach, are willing to have your QB stand back there and throw under those conditions, you probably do have a better chance of getting a first down to close it out. If it doesn't work- you take a sack, or your QB gets hit and fumbles- then you have hard questions to answer afterwards. That drives alot of the thinking, IMO.
Wild Hoss is offline   Reply With Quote Top
Old November 15th, 2016, 01:07 PM   #454
THE_WIZARD_
Senior Member
 
THE_WIZARD_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 5,148
Quote:
Originally Posted by WM Wolverine View Post
In a close game/ 4th quarter, officials will watch roughing the center more closely as teams will attempt to block the kick.
Supposed to watch it every kick formation. We signal to each other that protection for snapper, holder and kicker in place. We also talk to the defense to remind them of that. Yes it may go uncalled but not supposed to if they are doing their job. The snapper is afforded protection for 1 second...so an immediate charge on the snapper should be called regardless of the point in the game. After 1 second where they can reset themselves they are fair game.

Contact Against the Snapper
ARTICLE 14. When a team is in scrimmage kick formation, a defensive
player may not initiate contact with the snapper until one second has
elapsed after the snap (A.R. 9-1-14-I-III).
THE_WIZARD_ is offline   Reply With Quote Top
Old November 15th, 2016, 03:27 PM   #455
Jeff Buchanan
Senior Member
 
Jeff Buchanan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 6,422
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Hoss View Post
.........If you, as a coach, are willing to have your QB stand back there and throw under those conditions, you probably do have a better chance of getting a first down to close it out. If it doesn't work- you take a sack, or your QB gets hit and fumbles- then you have hard questions to answer afterwards. That drives alot of the thinking, IMO.
I think there is data that shows the probability of success given down, distance and field position with those probabilities being increased or decreased given other variables.

I have no idea if M uses these real time. I rather doubt it but they are around in various software programs and I do think this kind of stuff, put together by analysts, shows up on play sheets in one way or the other.

But your point is well taken ....... M turns the ball over as a result of a sack/ fumble or interception, I can guarantee you there will be a mountain of complaining from the peanut gallery that will be loudly hollering, "why didn't you just fucking run it!"

I had no problem with the play selection on the last series; it was the order it was called. The Run-Run-Pass approach removes any doubt about how the defense needs to set up on 3rd down and makes a blitz, like Iowa did run on third and eight, a lot more appropriate.

Iowa's Defense was in Zone coverage with CBs back off a bit for almost the entire game. Throw a quick out pattern for 4y on first down; that makes the defense's problem a lot harder on second down and third if you pick up a few more to make it 3rd and 2.

I also would have liked to see the PepCat package NOT do what it has done every time Peppers lines up at QB. Perfect time to use what that play does as a constraint to something else; like, a waggle to the back side and easy throw to an open TE who sneaks out there while the rest of the offense is moving play side to make it look like zone stretch.
__________________
On Harbaugh's expectations for M football in 2015 (NFL NETWORK): “We'd rather be about it than talk about it."
Jeff Buchanan is offline   Reply With Quote Top
Old November 15th, 2016, 03:42 PM   #456
WingsFan
Senior Member
 
WingsFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Posts: 8,490
Quote:
I also would have liked to see the PepCat package NOT do what it has done every time Peppers lines up at QB.
That play also relying on Jake Butt actually making a block (to secure the edge). It's the only way to succeed in some positive yards, and of course Butt block attempt on the outside LB was pathetic (as usual).
WingsFan is offline   Reply With Quote Top
Old November 15th, 2016, 03:48 PM   #457
Jeff Buchanan
Senior Member
 
Jeff Buchanan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 6,422
Out of that formation, Peppers is averaging 3.2y per carry. I read that somewhere. If the staff doesn't know that Butt has problems making blocks, maybe they should have thought about that and, if they really intended to run Peppers wide, put Wheatley in there who does make blocks. Nobody thought Jake was going to sneak out back side after chipping his man (a LB). If he had done so, it could have been a big play.

Opportunity lost, IMO.
__________________
On Harbaugh's expectations for M football in 2015 (NFL NETWORK): “We'd rather be about it than talk about it."
Jeff Buchanan is offline   Reply With Quote Top
Old November 15th, 2016, 03:59 PM   #458
Hannibal
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 7,420
I'm actually kind of surprised it took defenses so long to catch on. That and the Eddie McDoom running plays. We got nine games out of employing McDoom like Dennis Norfleet and Calvin Bell somehow.
Hannibal is offline   Reply With Quote Top
Old November 16th, 2016, 08:09 AM   #459
Wild Hoss
Senior Member
 
Wild Hoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 4,125
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Buchanan View Post
I think there is data that shows the probability of success given down, distance and field position with those probabilities being increased or decreased given other variables.

I have no idea if M uses these real time. I rather doubt it but they are around in various software programs and I do think this kind of stuff, put together by analysts, shows up on play sheets in one way or the other.

But your point is well taken ....... M turns the ball over as a result of a sack/ fumble or interception, I can guarantee you there will be a mountain of complaining from the peanut gallery that will be loudly hollering, "why didn't you just fucking run it!"

I had no problem with the play selection on the last series; it was the order it was called. The Run-Run-Pass approach removes any doubt about how the defense needs to set up on 3rd down and makes a blitz, like Iowa did run on third and eight, a lot more appropriate.

Iowa's Defense was in Zone coverage with CBs back off a bit for almost the entire game. Throw a quick out pattern for 4y on first down; that makes the defense's problem a lot harder on second down and third if you pick up a few more to make it 3rd and 2.

I also would have liked to see the PepCat package NOT do what it has done every time Peppers lines up at QB. Perfect time to use what that play does as a constraint to something else; like, a waggle to the back side and easy throw to an open TE who sneaks out there while the rest of the offense is moving play side to make it look like zone stretch.
I think there can be some good taken from data analysis, especially when it comes to 4th down attempts. The accepted thinking is outdated here IMO.

OTOH...Manny Diaz was a BIG believer in data analysis when he was DC at Texas. He was going to be a trend-setter in this regard. All I ever saw him do was blitz, subsequently give up 500 yards a game, and get fired. So all things in moderation. Heh.

Fear of criticism is huge in coaching, IMO. One of my favorite examples is facing a 4th and 4 in scoring position, down 10, late. What do coaches always do? Kick the FG. (Its what the color guy will say too) Then, IF they get the ball back, they inevitably have to go 70 yards in 1:03 with no timeouts, needing a touchdown. Its dumb...your odds are far better getting the 4 yards. Then if you succeed and score a TD, you get the ball back with maybe :30 and no timeouts, but only needing to go 35 yards, for a FG. But the former scenario can be acceptably defended at the postgame presser. "We got the ball late, but just couldn't get it done."

Agree that playcalling is probably more important that formations. You can line up in a MANBALL formation and still throw...but as an OC/HC, you have to choose to.
Wild Hoss is offline   Reply With Quote Top
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owners. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © DetroitLionsForum.com.
This site is a non-profit fan site and IS NOT affiliated with the NFL or Detroit Lions or any other sports team. Please visit the official site of the Detroit Lions for official information on the Lions.