DetroitLionsForum.com
Please support the forum by using this link to shop with our sponsor:

Go Back   DetroitLionsForum.com > Sports Discussion Forums > University of Michigan

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old October 14th, 2017, 10:21 PM   #181
Detroit Dan
Senior Member
 
Detroit Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Detroit
Posts: 3,378
This game was closer than it needed to be. Abandoning the passing game was assinine. O'Korn is bad enough without tying one hand behind his back. Throw a fucking pass.
Detroit Dan is offline   Reply With Quote Top
Old October 14th, 2017, 10:27 PM   #182
Detroit Dan
Senior Member
 
Detroit Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Detroit
Posts: 3,378
Michigan with 50-50 run-pass offense in first half: +10. Michigan with all run offense in second half: -10.
Detroit Dan is offline   Reply With Quote Top
Old October 14th, 2017, 11:15 PM   #183
hack
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 12,385
No interceptions, Dan. Michigan probably couldn't have afforded a turnover. IMO they won the game because they didn't make such crucial mistakes. Would have won the MSU game if they didn't make such crucial mistakes.

As for O'Korn, tying one hand behind his back isn't a half-bad idea.
hack is online now   Reply With Quote Top
Old October 14th, 2017, 11:22 PM   #184
hack
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 12,385
One very positive thing to note is Lavert Hill. Command of his position out there.
hack is online now   Reply With Quote Top
Old October 15th, 2017, 08:35 AM   #185
Jeff Buchanan
Senior Member
 
Jeff Buchanan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 6,417
Quote:
Originally Posted by Detroit Dan View Post
Michigan with 50-50 run-pass offense in first half: +10. Michigan with all run offense in second half: -10.
That was very strange indeed. Mere speculation but, JH's seems to have a trend line in his current tenure at M that causes him to sit on the smallest of leads.

In his defense, I think there is some analytics I've seen out there for pro-football where you take all your risks up front and minimize them on the back end. I think at the college level, although I don't know that if you did a study of this, you'd find that approach is high variance.

Anyway, I was disappointed. I don't think M can count on closing out games when leading by small margins by out executing the opponent's defense with strictly runs. it appears this is exactly what JH is trying to do and using Don Brown as his safety net. In this situation, M predictably goes 3 and out when all they need is a couple of first downs. The coaches might be able to make this easier with a modicum of passing on standard downs.

I think M missed that v. IU where the match-up analytics definitely showed IU was vulnerable there.
__________________
On Harbaugh's expectations for M football in 2015 (NFL NETWORK): “We'd rather be about it than talk about it."
Jeff Buchanan is online now   Reply With Quote Top
Old October 15th, 2017, 02:32 PM   #186
WingsFan
Senior Member
 
WingsFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Posts: 8,490
Michigan at Indiana game aired at noon ET — was highest-rated CFB game of weekend: 2.9 overnight.
WingsFan is offline   Reply With Quote Top
Old October 15th, 2017, 02:37 PM   #187
THE_WIZARD_
Senior Member
 
THE_WIZARD_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 5,145
shaddup
__________________
Shut the fuck up Donny!
THE_WIZARD_ is offline   Reply With Quote Top
Old October 15th, 2017, 09:27 PM   #188
Detroit Dan
Senior Member
 
Detroit Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Detroit
Posts: 3,378
The mistakes against MSU in the first half were fumbles -- nothing to do with the passing game. The second half we were behind and trying to tie the score. Perhaps passing in the pouring rain and wind was inadvisable then, but not applicable to second half against Indiana. Michigan played with one hand tied behind its back, and Indiana was up to the challenge.
Detroit Dan is offline   Reply With Quote Top
Old October 15th, 2017, 09:37 PM   #189
hack
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 12,385
Michigan WON. Probably in no small way because they won the turnover battle.
hack is online now   Reply With Quote Top
Old October 16th, 2017, 05:23 AM   #190
Hannibal
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 7,419
The turnovers didn't have an impact in this one. We won because we won a very lopsided rushing battle. Net punting kept Indiana in the game.
Hannibal is online now   Reply With Quote Top
Old October 16th, 2017, 07:03 AM   #191
hack
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 12,385
Which is the point -- we didn't turn it over, and yet still won despite not having a passing game. If they had given up a pick-6 like in other games, or surrendered the ball deep in their own territory, they probably wouldn't have won. First rule is Do No Harm. It sure wasn't JOK's ~50 passing yards in the first half that get them up 13-0. It was running the ball.
hack is online now   Reply With Quote Top
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owners. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © DetroitLionsForum.com.
This site is a non-profit fan site and IS NOT affiliated with the NFL or Detroit Lions or any other sports team. Please visit the official site of the Detroit Lions for official information on the Lions.